The `failed to find 08d460be0f1f9f128413f816022a6439e0078018` part is suspicious.
The `failed to load emulation data` was likely the old network/proxy problem.
The patch only included the endianness handling for a particular device. The hash is probably in the wrong endianness order, I suppose?
The `failed to find 08d460be0f1f9f1 28413f816022a64 39e0078018` part is suspicious.
The `failed to load emulation data` was likely the old network/proxy problem.
The patch only included the endianness handling for a particular device. The hash is probably in the wrong endianness order, I suppose?