Comment 13 for bug 1660547
Revision history for this message
| Daniel Kochmański (jackdaniel) wrote | #13 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
I'm guessing the intention of the person, who decided to name the system that way, not stating that there is conflict.
What is loaded by require is asdf.fas file, libasdf.a is for an executable inclusion (and is defined in prebuilt-asdf.asd system). This mechanism is something being there at least in ECL 13.5.1. Regarding predicting the future – it's something I'm not capable of. API of what? Require?