I have fixed this and pushed a patch. I'm not proud of it, because it adds complexity to the body of the function, and perhaps I should have just made
#+clisp #+gcl #-(or clisp gcl)
instead of what I did.
But it fixes the bug I see. I'll wait for a while to see if anyone comments, otherwise this will be 3.1.7.2
I have fixed this and pushed a patch. I'm not proud of it, because it adds complexity to the body of the function, and perhaps I should have just made
#+clisp
#+gcl
#-(or clisp gcl)
instead of what I did.
But it fixes the bug I see. I'll wait for a while to see if anyone comments, otherwise this will be 3.1.7.2