ASDF is working as designed. If you want CamelCase, you need to use a string, not a symbol, as in (asdf:load-system "RE-tools"). Note that the defsystem needs to also use a string, as well as all references to the system.
The reasons why this is are many: many "modern" common lisp implementations have a case-preserving reader, but most "traditional" (and standard-compliant) implementations are case-converting. It is therefore not portable to rely on the case of a symbol (unless you |escape it|), and ASDF needs to case-convert itself; it chooses to downcase, which makes for much nicer file names.
CamelCase is not portably compatible with logical-pathnames, for similar reasons. Not that anyone sane should use logical-pathnames.
While CamelCase names are supported in the above way (using "Strings"), they are not idiomatic and are somehow frowned upon for public libraries.
ASDF is working as designed. If you want CamelCase, you need to use a string, not a symbol, as in (asdf:load-system "RE-tools"). Note that the defsystem needs to also use a string, as well as all references to the system.
The reasons why this is are many: many "modern" common lisp implementations have a case-preserving reader, but most "traditional" (and standard-compliant) implementations are case-converting. It is therefore not portable to rely on the case of a symbol (unless you |escape it|), and ASDF needs to case-convert itself; it chooses to downcase, which makes for much nicer file names.
CamelCase is not portably compatible with logical-pathnames, for similar reasons. Not that anyone sane should use logical-pathnames.
While CamelCase names are supported in the above way (using "Strings"), they are not idiomatic and are somehow frowned upon for public libraries.