In this, the 'ix' transition to '@{profile_name}//&foo' makes no sense. In today's implementation, ix rules only support relative transitions but '@{profile_name}//&foo' is a direct transition.
In discussing this bug it was decided that ix exec stack transitions will be obsoleted. Feel free to use this bug to track that.
$ cat /tmp/foo
#include <tunables/global>
profile foo {}
profile test {
#include <abstractions/base>
/foo/** ix -> @{profile_ name}// &foo,
}
In this, the 'ix' transition to '@{profile_ name}// &foo' makes no sense. In today's implementation, ix rules only support relative transitions but '@{profile_ name}// &foo' is a direct transition.
In discussing this bug it was decided that ix exec stack transitions will be obsoleted. Feel free to use this bug to track that.