Comment 6 for bug 1327773

Revision history for this message
Georges Racinet (gracinet) wrote :

great !

We'll think about rebase later (still an interesting idea to keep around)

About revert, I'm realizing that while resetting to origin/master is the wished behaviour for the two use-cases of the merges-in feature, it's really dangerous for other cases, since it would drop unpushed original changesets (so far the only use-case for revert is to redo a merge).

Maybe we could have that method react in different way if triggered via on-merge ? What do you think ?
In any case, we'll have to warn strongly in doc.