© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
7020100
(Get the code!)
Yes, eiskaltdcpp seems to (intentionally) generate malformed lists and disobey the spec: https:/
The same happens with FlylinkDC++ as well, while AirDC++ and DC++ will handle shared duplicates correctly via merging/renaming. At the moment, AirDC++ is probably only client that validates the lists for duplicates, which is problematic indeed if no one else cares about the validity. I'll create a new issue for DC++ a bit later.
ps. https:/