>> +
>> +libvdpausysconfdir=$(sysconfdir)
>> +libvdpausysconf_DATA = vdpau_wrapper.cfg
>
> This breaks distcheck:
>
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `vdpau_wrapper.cfg', needed by `all-am'. Stop.
>
> I think this needs to be dist_libvdpausysconf_DATA.
I'm not sure why you wouldn't be seeing that in the Debian package since your debdiff adds the incorrect line rather than the fixed version in the upstream repository:
Strange. The line in question is the one I mentioned in my reply to Stephen's original mail: http:// lists.freedeskt op.org/ archives/ vdpau/2012- September/ 000023. html
>> + fdir=$( sysconfdir) f_DATA = vdpau_wrapper.cfg wrapper. cfg', needed by `all-am'. Stop. sconf_DATA.
>> +libvdpausyscon
>> +libvdpausyscon
>
> This breaks distcheck:
>
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `vdpau_
>
> I think this needs to be dist_libvdpausy
I'm not sure why you wouldn't be seeing that in the Debian package since your debdiff adds the incorrect line rather than the fixed version in the upstream repository:
+@@ -27,3 +28,6 @@ libvdpauincludedir = $(includedir)/vdpau _HEADERS = \ /include/ vdpau/vdpau. h \ /include/ vdpau/vdpau_ x11.h nfdir=$ (sysconfdir) nf_DATA = vdpau_wrapper.cfg
+ libvdpauinclude
+ $(top_srcdir)
+ $(top_srcdir)
++
++libvdpausysco
++libvdpausysco
In any case, if it works for you and no one is actually expecting to use dist / distcheck from the Ubuntu package, then the difference is moot.