some of these stats are 64-bit ints, or "long long"s, and Python doesn't have built-in support for these types as far as i know. so it is understandable that SWIG would use some kind of holder to get around these limitations and still be able to maintain precision.
some of these stats are 64-bit ints, or "long long"s, and Python doesn't have built-in support for these types as far as i know. so it is understandable that SWIG would use some kind of holder to get around these limitations and still be able to maintain precision.
i assume "print repr(stat)" would work, no?