thanks for your response.
I think we can close it for now, since it is quite specific to the implementation on our side and I did modify it, so it works now.
It is not easy to reproduce it, since there is a lot of code potentially involved.
If it pops up again, I'll report it with more detail.
Eyal,
thanks for your response.
I think we can close it for now, since it is quite specific to the implementation on our side and I did modify it, so it works now.
It is not easy to reproduce it, since there is a lot of code potentially involved.
If it pops up again, I'll report it with more detail.