I've noticed that if ubiquity is using 2 swap files, then this bug will never occur.
It's also a known behavior of the swapoff function. See this comment:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/45441/what-command-can-be-used-to-force-release-everything-in-swap-partition-back-to-m#comment62823_45443
I've noticed that if ubiquity is using 2 swap files, then this bug will never occur.
It's also a known behavior of the swapoff function. See this comment:
http:// unix.stackexcha nge.com/ questions/ 45441/what- command- can-be- used-to- force-release- everything- in-swap- partition- back-to- m#comment62823_ 45443