Quoting Andy Whitcroft (<email address hidden>):
> @serge -- have we heard anything further from upstream. The thread you
> started seems quiet. I suspect we need to debug this more before they
> are going to react.
Yeah I'd gotten distracted during the day yesterday. When I looked more
into it last night, I think I found another solution. Namely, every
place where the code replaced by calls to kvm_inject_realmode_interrupt()
incremented the rmode.irq.rip, we need to do the same.
I can try my hand at a patch today (or leave it in your capable hands)
Quoting Andy Whitcroft (<email address hidden>):
> @serge -- have we heard anything further from upstream. The thread you
> started seems quiet. I suspect we need to debug this more before they
> are going to react.
Yeah I'd gotten distracted during the day yesterday. When I looked more realmode_ interrupt( )
into it last night, I think I found another solution. Namely, every
place where the code replaced by calls to kvm_inject_
incremented the rmode.irq.rip, we need to do the same.
I can try my hand at a patch today (or leave it in your capable hands)