Comment 21 for bug 1700827

Revision history for this message
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) wrote :

I'm doing this review (I'm not done though).

As a preliminary comment as to my view of the state of the package (as notes to self so I don't forget):

- Why is this set as a native package? It's rather obviously not one, as it also ships and works on other distributions.
- pcp is still using compat 5, and old-format rules file. I think given its complexity it would really benefit (from a maintainability point-of-view) if the packaging was modernized -- compat level 9, using simpler dh-style rules, etc.