Comment 47 for bug 1220165

Revision history for this message
Colin Watson (cjwatson) wrote :

I was wrong; Phillip identified this correctly as being due to a bug in avoid-disturbing-partitions.patch in the case where some of the partitions in the new layout start at the same position as partitions of the same number in the old layout but extend over parts of the disk previously occupied by partitions of higher numbers. He's working on a patch to reorder the remove/add code to avoid this.