Comment 33 for bug 760131

Revision history for this message
nanog (sorenimpey) wrote :

Looks like the discussion at lkml has been going on for a long time.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/26/249

This history of this set of patches correlates well with the timeline of increased power consumption from phoronix testing. IMO, the loss of power consumption does not equal the benefit of increased kernel responsiveness especially for laptops.

>I haven't tested this, but single CPU/single core machines might not be affected by this,
As one would expect this bug is present on hyperthreaded single core atom chips.
For those who want increased battery life on their atom chips...2.6.34 is running terrifically in natty.