Comment 210 for bug 760131

@ Tim Gardner and Leann Ogasawara - further to comment #209, particularly the last sentence, I have reviewed this bug. The author of comment #168 has not tested the patch from comment #164 which you refer to in comment #201. They performed a "package-upgrade" to linux-image 2.6.38-11 (which version we are not sure) before the patch was even in natty-proposed. Comment #195 is vague, and comment #196 is about hardware which does not support the energy performance bias MSR.

Therefore, given the large number of subsequent comments stating that the patch has not reduced power consumption, and given the original reporter (I am led to believe they are a Canonical employee)'s hardware, can we really mark this bug as Fix Released, or even as Fix Committed?

However, marking as verification done for the SRU for the energy performance bias MSR seems appropriate - I agree with comment #200.