The load avg is only related to the number of runnable/uninterruptible processes. There can be hundreds of threads and 0.00 load avg if they are all waiting or sleeping.
However, your screenshot shows consistent cpu utilization of 15-20%, so one would think the load avg would be at least 0.2 for at least the 1 minute mark. The load avg is calculated once every 5 seconds inside the kernel. At that point in time, the average is recomputed using the current number of runnable/uninterruptible processes. To have a load avg of 0.00, obviously there could not have been any runnable or uninterruptible processes in the last 5 minutes during every 5 second capture point.
I think it would be most helpful to get identical comparisons between the two distros, preferrably the dmstat output on karmic.
The load avg is only related to the number of runnable/ uninterruptible processes. There can be hundreds of threads and 0.00 load avg if they are all waiting or sleeping.
However, your screenshot shows consistent cpu utilization of 15-20%, so one would think the load avg would be at least 0.2 for at least the 1 minute mark. The load avg is calculated once every 5 seconds inside the kernel. At that point in time, the average is recomputed using the current number of runnable/ uninterruptible processes. To have a load avg of 0.00, obviously there could not have been any runnable or uninterruptible processes in the last 5 minutes during every 5 second capture point.
I think it would be most helpful to get identical comparisons between the two distros, preferrably the dmstat output on karmic.