Comment 16 for bug 305587
Revision history for this message
| Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote Re: [Jaunty] warning: missing LSB information | #16 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
Some more rationale: people who customized the init script will get a conffile prompt on upgrades, which breaks automatic upgrades (which are quite common on stable releases). Also, there are packages which actually evaluate those LSB headers, such as insserv. By adding a new one, we potentially change the boot sequence, which again introduces a regression potential.