implicit-timezone failures

[Sorin Marian Nasoi]

In the latest version of the FOTS snapshot, FOTS_200313.tgz the following test cases fail:

- from "op-time-greater-than" test set
 "cbcl-time-greater-than-004,cbcl-time-greater-than-005,cbcl-time-greater-than-009,cbcl-time-greater-than-010"

- from "op-time-less-than" test set
"cbcl-time-less-than-004,cbcl-time-less-than-005,cbcl-time-less-than-009,cbcl-time-less-than-010"

Please see attached XML for details.

[Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi)]

Please see thread 'implicit-timezone()' on @zorba-dev.

[Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi)]

Please take a look on this W3C bug:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21222

[Paul J. Lucas (paul-lucas)]

All these tests currently pass.

[Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi)]

These are not fixed, they can not be reproduced any more, that is different: please see "implicit-timezone()" on zorba-dev.

[Chris Hillery (ceejatec)]

Assigning back to Sorin as the bug is marked Incomplete (which means "needs more info from reporter"). Lowering priority and removing milestone as it is not currently clear whether there is a bug here.

[Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi)]

Paul marked it as "Fixed" after he ran the test-cases mentioned and they passed.

Then, I marked the bug as "Incomplete" to point out the bug is not "Fixed" with the info in comment #5:
"These are not fixed, they can not be reproduced any more, that is different: please see "implicit-timezone()" on zorba-dev. "

So, my intention was not to say that I (as the reporter) need to give more information: sorry for the confusion.
Marking the bug as "Confirmed": please see "implicit-timezone()" thread on zorba-dev for details.