jn:object() not implemented
Bug #1035146 reported by
Chris Hillery
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zorba |
Fix Released
|
Critical
|
Ghislain Fourny | ||
Bug Description
Without it, dynamic object creation is all but impossible.
Related branches
lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/jsoniq-library-functions
- Matthias Brantner: Approve
- Chris Hillery: Approve
- Till Westmann: Approve
-
Diff: 503 lines (+327/-0)24 files modifiedChangeLog (+2/-0)
modules/org/jsoniq/www/CMakeLists.txt (+2/-0)
modules/org/jsoniq/www/function-library.xq (+174/-0)
modules/org/jsoniq/www/functions.xq (+15/-0)
src/context/static_context.cpp (+3/-0)
src/functions/func_jsoniq_functions_impl.cpp (+22/-0)
src/functions/func_jsoniq_functions_impl.h (+14/-0)
src/functions/function_consts.h (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/ExpQueryResults/zorba/jsoniq/jn_accumulate.xml.res (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/ExpQueryResults/zorba/jsoniq/jn_descendant_objects.xml.res (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/ExpQueryResults/zorba/jsoniq/jn_descendant_pairs.xml.res (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/ExpQueryResults/zorba/jsoniq/jn_intersect.xml.res (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/ExpQueryResults/zorba/jsoniq/jn_values.xml.res (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/ExpQueryResults/zorba/jsoniq/object_03.xml.res (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/Queries/zorba/jsoniq/jn_accumulate.spec (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/Queries/zorba/jsoniq/jn_accumulate.xq (+16/-0)
test/rbkt/Queries/zorba/jsoniq/jn_descendant_objects.spec (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/Queries/zorba/jsoniq/jn_descendant_objects.xq (+10/-0)
test/rbkt/Queries/zorba/jsoniq/jn_descendant_pairs.spec (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/Queries/zorba/jsoniq/jn_descendant_pairs.xq (+10/-0)
test/rbkt/Queries/zorba/jsoniq/jn_intersect.xq (+20/-0)
test/rbkt/Queries/zorba/jsoniq/jn_values.spec (+1/-0)
test/rbkt/Queries/zorba/jsoniq/jn_values.xq (+10/-0)
test/rbkt/Queries/zorba/jsoniq/object_03.xq (+18/-0)
| Changed in zorba: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Critical |
| milestone: | none → 2.7 |
| assignee: | nobody → Ghislain Fourny (gislenius) |
Revision history for this message
| Ghislain Fourny (gislenius) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in zorba: | |
| status: | New → In Progress |
| Changed in zorba: | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| Changed in zorba: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
It is actually possible using {| |}, however it makes sense to support it for interoperability.