Activity log for bug #1734653

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2017-11-27 10:14:42 Bruno Chareyre bug added bug
2017-12-06 21:12:20 Robert Caulk attachment added IMG_8150.JPG https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734653/+attachment/5019427/+files/IMG_8150.JPG
2017-12-07 15:46:49 Bruno Chareyre description In the basic PFV scheme the incremental change of density of a pore fluid after a change of pore volume is dependent on dV/Vo where Vo is the reference pore space within a tetrahedral cell [1], i.e. V(tetrahedron)-V(spheres). In DFNFlow "V" should reflect the fact that porosity may be mainly due to a crack an its opening. Typically V=V(tetrahedron)-opening*area-matrixPorosity. Currently it is using the same formula, hence overestimating the compressibility effect (because the DEM porosity is larger than a typical rock porosity). What should be the reference "opening" in above formula is to be clarified though, it has physical as well as numerical implications. Maybe slotInitialAperture is a candidate? Let you DFN people tell what it should be. Note that the "dV" is less a problem because it is a difference (independent on the choice of the reference volume), so the incompressible scheme is not affected. Bruno [1] https://github.com/yade/trunk/blob/master/pkg/pfv/FlowEngine.ipp.in#L439 In the basic PFV scheme the incremental change of density of a pore fluid after a change of pore volume is dependent on dV/Vo where Vo is the reference pore space within a tetrahedral cell [1], i.e. V(tetrahedron)-V(spheres). In DFNFlow "V" should reflect the fact that porosity is mainly due to cracks, i.e. it is much smaller than the numerical porosity calculated between spheres. Typically V=opening*area+matrixPorosity*cellVolume Currently it is using the same formula, hence overestimating the compressibility effect (because the DEM porosity is larger than a typical rock porosity). What should be the reference "opening" in above formula is to be clarified though, it has physical as well as numerical implications. Maybe slotInitialAperture is a candidate? Let you DFN people tell what it should be. Note that the "dV" is less a problem because it is a difference (independent on the choice of the reference volume), so the incompressible scheme is not affected. Bruno [1] https://github.com/yade/trunk/blob/master/pkg/pfv/FlowEngine.ipp.in#L439
2017-12-08 19:27:04 Luc Scholtès attachment added facetCrackLogic.jpg https://bugs.launchpad.net/yade/+bug/1734653/+attachment/5020309/+files/facetCrackLogic.jpg