> No and I don't have those files.
Confirm. I don't have those files in my archive (md5: eed5daf69f0b970aec0a654fdfcb731e) either. Blobs there are standard parts of Mesa DRI driver (unichrome_dri.so and libGL.so). The only strange part is libglx.so, but according to vinstall script it's used on FC6/7 only. But whether those blobs can be generated for the sources provided and what are the licensing terms for them (and last but not least does them suffer from the bug 5092) is still unknown, so I'd rather agree with #33 - lets stop posting here unless we have some specific information regarding the bug.
> No and I don't have those files. aec0a654fdfcb73 1e) either. Blobs there are standard parts of Mesa DRI driver (unichrome_dri.so and libGL.so). The only strange part is libglx.so, but according to vinstall script it's used on FC6/7 only. But whether those blobs can be generated for the sources provided and what are the licensing terms for them (and last but not least does them suffer from the bug 5092) is still unknown, so I'd rather agree with #33 - lets stop posting here unless we have some specific information regarding the bug.
Confirm. I don't have those files in my archive (md5: eed5daf69f0b970