assumes working tree is unchanged
Bug #585961 reported by
Jelmer Vernooij
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wikkid Wiki |
Incomplete
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
affects wikkid
When attempting to access a directory that has been added in the working
tree but not committed yet, I get an exception.
FileStore.
which instead attempts to use the basis tree.
I'm happy to provide a patch but not sure which of the two wikkid should
be using - the working tree or the basis tree? Is using a branch with a
working tree not modified by wikkid supported at all?
Revision history for this message
| Tim Penhey (thumper) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in wikkid: | |
| status: | New → Incomplete |
To post a comment you must log in.
I chose to use a working tree for efficiency of getting the latest text (and for writing out changes).
Aaron said he had a branch that would allow wikkid to commit directly to the branch (without the need for a working tree).
I think it is preferable to have it commit to the branch, and update the tree if it exists. We should complain if the working tree has been modified by a third party I think.
So... where to from here?