VM

  1. Bug #1075290
  2. Activity log

Activity log for bug #1075290

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2012-11-05 19:31:32 Uday Reddy bug added bug
2012-11-05 19:44:23 Uday Reddy description Setting vm-sort-subthreads is supposed to sort the threads by their root messages and the rest in a linear way without reference to the subthreads. It is not clear that it is working correctly. For example, here is a particular sort-order observed: 3783 11/3 lsmithso@hare.dem 304 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media ->3784+3 * 11/3 Tim Cross 2276 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media 3785 11/3 Julian Bradfield 854 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media In reality, 3783 is a response to 3785, but it is shown preceding 3784 (the visible root of the thread). If vm-sort-subthreads is t, everything works normally. Setting vm-sort-subthreads is supposed to sort the threads by their root messages and the rest in a linear way without reference to the subthreads. It is not clear that it is working correctly. For example, here is a particular sort-order observed:     3783 11/3 lsmithso@hare.dem 304 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media ->3784+3 * 11/3 Tim Cross 2276 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media     3785 11/3 Julian Bradfield 854 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media In reality, 3783 is a response to 3785, but it is shown preceding 3784 (the visible root of the thread). If vm-sort-subthreads is t, everything works normally.
2012-11-05 20:09:40 Uday Reddy description Setting vm-sort-subthreads is supposed to sort the threads by their root messages and the rest in a linear way without reference to the subthreads. It is not clear that it is working correctly. For example, here is a particular sort-order observed:     3783 11/3 lsmithso@hare.dem 304 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media ->3784+3 * 11/3 Tim Cross 2276 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media     3785 11/3 Julian Bradfield 854 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media In reality, 3783 is a response to 3785, but it is shown preceding 3784 (the visible root of the thread). If vm-sort-subthreads is t, everything works normally. Setting vm-sort-subthreads is supposed to sort the threads by their root messages and the rest in a linear way without reference to the subthreads. It is not clear that it is working correctly. For example, here is a particular sort-order observed:     3783 11/3 lsmithso@hare.dem 304 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media ->3784+3 * 11/3 Tim Cross 2276 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media     3785 11/3 Julian Bradfield 854 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media In reality, 3783 is a response to 3785, but it is shown preceding 3784 (the visible root of the thread). If vm-sort-subthreads is t, everything works normally.
2012-11-05 20:10:04 Uday Reddy description Setting vm-sort-subthreads is supposed to sort the threads by their root messages and the rest in a linear way without reference to the subthreads. It is not clear that it is working correctly. For example, here is a particular sort-order observed:     3783 11/3 lsmithso@hare.dem 304 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media ->3784+3 * 11/3 Tim Cross 2276 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media     3785 11/3 Julian Bradfield 854 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media In reality, 3783 is a response to 3785, but it is shown preceding 3784 (the visible root of the thread). If vm-sort-subthreads is t, everything works normally. Setting vm-sort-subthreads is supposed to sort the threads by their root messages and the rest in a linear way without reference to the subthreads. It is not clear that it is working correctly. For example, here is a particular sort-order observed:      3783 11/3 lsmithso@hare.dem 304 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media  ->3784+3 * 11/3 Tim Cross 2276 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media      3785 11/3 Julian Bradfield 854 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media In reality, 3783 is a response to 3785, but it is shown preceding 3784 (the visible root of the thread). If vm-sort-subthreads is t, everything works normally.
2012-11-05 20:13:14 Uday Reddy description Setting vm-sort-subthreads is supposed to sort the threads by their root messages and the rest in a linear way without reference to the subthreads. It is not clear that it is working correctly. For example, here is a particular sort-order observed:      3783 11/3 lsmithso@hare.dem 304 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media  ->3784+3 * 11/3 Tim Cross 2276 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media      3785 11/3 Julian Bradfield 854 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media In reality, 3783 is a response to 3785, but it is shown preceding 3784 (the visible root of the thread). If vm-sort-subthreads is t, everything works normally. Setting vm-sort-subthreads is supposed to sort the threads by their root messages and the rest in a linear way without reference to the subthreads. It is not clear that it is working correctly. For example, here is a particular sort-order observed: <pre>       3783 11/3 lsmithso@hare.dem 304 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media   ->3784+3 * 11/3 Tim Cross 2276 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media       3785 11/3 Julian Bradfield 854 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media </pre> In reality, 3783 is a response to 3785, but it is shown preceding 3784 (the visible root of the thread). If vm-sort-subthreads is t, everything works normally.
2012-11-05 20:13:36 Uday Reddy description Setting vm-sort-subthreads is supposed to sort the threads by their root messages and the rest in a linear way without reference to the subthreads. It is not clear that it is working correctly. For example, here is a particular sort-order observed: <pre>       3783 11/3 lsmithso@hare.dem 304 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media   ->3784+3 * 11/3 Tim Cross 2276 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media       3785 11/3 Julian Bradfield 854 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media </pre> In reality, 3783 is a response to 3785, but it is shown preceding 3784 (the visible root of the thread). If vm-sort-subthreads is t, everything works normally. Setting vm-sort-subthreads is supposed to sort the threads by their root messages and the rest in a linear way without reference to the subthreads. It is not clear that it is working correctly. For example, here is a particular sort-order observed:       3783 11/3 lsmithso@hare.dem 304 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media   ->3784+3 * 11/3 Tim Cross 2276 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media       3785 11/3 Julian Bradfield 854 Re: Email dangers portrayed in media In reality, 3783 is a response to 3785, but it is shown preceding 3784 (the visible root of the thread). If vm-sort-subthreads is t, everything works normally.