Activity log for bug #64383

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2006-10-06 16:33:12 Andrew Jorgensen bug added bug
2006-10-07 13:12:20 Sebastien Bacher file-roller: status Unconfirmed Needs Info
2006-10-07 13:12:20 Sebastien Bacher file-roller: assignee desktop-bugs
2006-10-07 13:12:20 Sebastien Bacher file-roller: statusexplanation Thanks for your bug. What does "isoinfo -J -R -l -i image.iso" list?
2006-10-09 16:26:55 Andrew Jorgensen file-roller: status Needs Info Unconfirmed
2006-10-09 16:26:55 Andrew Jorgensen file-roller: statusexplanation Thanks for your bug. What does "isoinfo -J -R -l -i image.iso" list? $ isoinfo -J -R -l -i image.iso isoinfo: Unable to find Joliet SVD
2006-12-22 22:06:12 Sebastien Bacher file-roller: statusexplanation $ isoinfo -J -R -l -i image.iso isoinfo: Unable to find Joliet SVD isoinfo is doing the same, either a bug from genisoimage or from the image, reassigning
2006-12-22 22:06:20 Sebastien Bacher cdrkit: assignee desktop-bugs
2006-12-22 22:06:20 Sebastien Bacher cdrkit: statusexplanation isoinfo is doing the same, either a bug from genisoimage or from the image, reassigning
2008-09-10 19:11:17 Daniel T Chen title File Roller doesn't read UDF UDF not properly recognised
2008-12-22 20:25:13 Gaetan Nadon cdrkit: status New Confirmed
2008-12-22 20:25:13 Gaetan Nadon cdrkit: statusexplanation I was able to reproduce the problem in Intrepid ubuntu-8.10-alternate-amd64. The File Roller does not recognize the UDF filesystem on the MS Vista iso image. It only displays the README text. It is worth noting that Ubuntu mounts the file system correctly and adds an icon labeled UDF volume. The UDF support in Ubuntu is sufficient for applications to mount and explore UDF filesystems. The isoinfo command was perhaps misleading. It is documented as reading ISO9600 filesystems, no mention of UDF. The command with the -d option states that the vista image does not contain either Joliet nor Rock Ridge extensions. Invoking the command with -R would list the Rock Ridge extension but silently returns as there is none. Invoking the command with -J would list the Joliet extension but issues an error message which may mean a bug in the command or a bad iso. In fact, it's just that the Joliet extension is not there. Given that the UDF support is present in Ubuntu, it would be appreciated if the File Roller developer make a support statement regarding UDF file system. Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better!
2008-12-22 20:26:56 Gaetan Nadon cdrkit: bugtargetdisplayname cdrkit (Ubuntu) file-roller (Ubuntu)
2008-12-22 20:26:56 Gaetan Nadon cdrkit: bugtargetname cdrkit (Ubuntu) file-roller (Ubuntu)
2008-12-22 20:26:56 Gaetan Nadon cdrkit: statusexplanation I was able to reproduce the problem in Intrepid ubuntu-8.10-alternate-amd64. The File Roller does not recognize the UDF filesystem on the MS Vista iso image. It only displays the README text. It is worth noting that Ubuntu mounts the file system correctly and adds an icon labeled UDF volume. The UDF support in Ubuntu is sufficient for applications to mount and explore UDF filesystems. The isoinfo command was perhaps misleading. It is documented as reading ISO9600 filesystems, no mention of UDF. The command with the -d option states that the vista image does not contain either Joliet nor Rock Ridge extensions. Invoking the command with -R would list the Rock Ridge extension but silently returns as there is none. Invoking the command with -J would list the Joliet extension but issues an error message which may mean a bug in the command or a bad iso. In fact, it's just that the Joliet extension is not there. Given that the UDF support is present in Ubuntu, it would be appreciated if the File Roller developer make a support statement regarding UDF file system. Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better!
2008-12-22 20:26:56 Gaetan Nadon cdrkit: title Bug #64383 in cdrkit (Ubuntu): "UDF not properly recognised" Bug #64383 in file-roller (Ubuntu): "UDF not properly recognised"
2009-02-13 11:14:05 Sebastien Bacher file-roller: importance Undecided Low
2009-02-13 11:14:05 Sebastien Bacher file-roller: assignee desktop-bugs
2009-06-03 13:21:51 Sebastien Bacher bug task added fileroller
2009-07-20 18:15:40 Pedro Villavicencio bug watch added http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589158
2009-07-20 18:15:40 Pedro Villavicencio file-roller (Ubuntu): status Confirmed Triaged
2009-07-20 18:15:56 Pedro Villavicencio file-roller: importance Undecided Unknown
2009-07-20 18:15:56 Pedro Villavicencio file-roller: status New Unknown
2009-07-20 18:15:56 Pedro Villavicencio file-roller: remote watch GNOME Bug Tracker #589158
2009-07-20 19:02:33 Bug Watch Updater file-roller: status Unknown New
2010-05-19 01:23:40 Rodrigo Primo bug task added usb-creator
2010-07-02 08:04:11 Mircea Postolache removed subscriber Mircea Postolache
2010-07-09 08:55:27 Pacho Ramos bug added subscriber Pacho Ramos
2010-07-11 12:15:20 arky usb-creator: status New Confirmed
2010-09-15 23:32:07 Andrew Jorgensen removed subscriber Andrew Jorgensen
2010-09-16 11:45:34 Bug Watch Updater file-roller: importance Unknown Medium
2014-07-31 11:03:52 Veikko Mäkelä bug task added linuxmint
2015-04-28 12:45:27 chemicalfan linuxmint: status New Invalid
2016-06-14 01:03:31 Bug Watch Updater file-roller: status New Confirmed