------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2016-12-13 15:01 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #13)
> kvm_hv and kvm_pr do not appear to be module names in the 4.8 kernel, nor
> were they included in the Bug Description list.
You're right, we didn't include them at first sight - I'm sorry, my bad.
But they are modules - found them on /lib/modules, in 4.8.0-30 kernel directory:
Will post a 2nd round of modules to be included in main kernel package soon - guess this should be kept verification-need until them, if possible, or some other more accurate state.
Thanks,
Guilherme
------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2016-12-13 15:04 EDT-------
Ohh...now I see. I said "kvm_{pr, hv}" whereas the correct is kvm-{pr, hv}.
Apologies!
------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2016-12-13 15:01 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #13)
> kvm_hv and kvm_pr do not appear to be module names in the 4.8 kernel, nor
> were they included in the Bug Description list.
You're right, we didn't include them at first sight - I'm sorry, my bad.
But they are modules - found them on /lib/modules, in 4.8.0-30 kernel directory:
# find . | grep kvm arch/powerpc/ kvm arch/powerpc/ kvm/kvm. ko arch/powerpc/ kvm/kvm- pr.ko arch/powerpc/ kvm/kvm- hv.ko
./kernel/
./kernel/
./kernel/
./kernel/
Will post a 2nd round of modules to be included in main kernel package soon - guess this should be kept verification-need until them, if possible, or some other more accurate state.
Thanks,
Guilherme
------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2016-12-13 15:04 EDT-------
Ohh...now I see. I said "kvm_{pr, hv}" whereas the correct is kvm-{pr, hv}.
Apologies!