linux-hwe-edge: 4.10.0-22.24~16.04.1 -proposed tracker

Bug #1691149 reported by Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Certification-testing
Invalid
Medium
Taihsiang Ho
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Promote-to-security
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Security Team
Upload-to-ppa
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Xenial
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the <version to be filled> upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
kernel-stable-master-bug: 1691146
phase: Released
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

CVE References

tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-xenial
tags: added: xenial
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
tags: added: kernel-sru-cycle-2017.05.16-1
tags: added: kernel-sru-backport-of-1691146
summary: - linux-hwe-edge: <version to be filled> -proposed tracker
+ linux-hwe-edge: 4.10.0-22.24~16.04.1 -proposed tracker
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: block-proposed
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 9, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 14, failed: 1
39 comments hidden view all 119 comments
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote :

No need to has certification test. Fix incorrect status assignment for certification-test.

Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: removed: block-proposed-xenial
tags: removed: block-proposed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :
Download full text (16.1 KiB)

This bug was fixed in the package linux-hwe-edge - 4.10.0-22.24~16.04.1

---------------
linux-hwe-edge (4.10.0-22.24~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=low

  * linux-hwe-edge: 4.10.0-22.24~16.04.1 -proposed tracker (LP: #1691149)

  * linux: 4.10.0-22.24 -proposed tracker (LP: #1691146)

  * Fix NVLINK2 TCE route (LP: #1690155)
    - powerpc/powernv: Fix TCE kill on NVLink2

  * CVE-2017-0605
    - tracing: Use strlcpy() instead of strcpy() in __trace_find_cmdline()

  * perf: qcom: Add L3 cache PMU driver (LP: #1689856)
    - [Config] CONFIG_QCOM_L3_PMU=y
    - perf: qcom: Add L3 cache PMU driver

  * No PMU support for ACPI-based arm64 systems (LP: #1689661)
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rework per-cpu allocation
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: manage interrupts per-cpu
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split irq request from enable
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: define armpmu_init_fn
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: fold init into alloc
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: factor out pmu registration
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: simplify cpu_pmu_request_irqs()
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: handle no platform_device
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split out platform device probe logic
    - arm64: add function to get a cpu's MADT GICC table
    - [Config] CONFIG_ARM_PMU_ACPI=y
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add ACPI framework
    - arm64: pmuv3: handle !PMUv3 when probing
    - arm64: pmuv3: use arm_pmu ACPI framework

  * [SRU][Zesty]QDF2400 kernel oops on ipmitool fru write 0 fru.bin
    (LP: #1689886)
    - ipmi: Fix kernel panic at ipmi_ssif_thread()

  * tty: pl011: fix earlycon work-around for QDF2400 erratum 44 (LP: #1689818)
    - tty: pl011: fix earlycon work-around for QDF2400 erratum 44
    - tty: pl011: use "qdf2400_e44" as the earlycon name for QDF2400 E44

  * kernel-wedge fails in artful due to leftover squashfs-modules d-i files
    (LP: #1688259)
    - Remove squashfs-modules files from d-i
    - [Config] as squashfs-modules is builtin kernel-image must Provides: it

  * arm64/ACPI support for SBSA watchdog (LP: #1688114)
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: clean up printk usage
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: rename type macros
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: rename the PPI enum
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: move enums and defines to header file
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: add a new enum for spi type
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: rework PPI selection
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: split dt-only rate handling
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: refactor arch_timer_needs_probing
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init
      call
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: add structs to describe MMIO timer
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: split MMIO timer probing.
    - [Config] CONFIG_ACPI_GTDT=y
    - acpi/arm64: Add GTDT table parse driver
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: simplify ACPI support code.
    - acpi/arm64: Add memory-mapped timer support in GTD...

Changed in linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → Fix Released
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Package Released!

The package has been published and the bug is being set to Fix Released

Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
description: updated
description: updated
Displaying first 40 and last 40 comments. View all 119 comments or add a comment.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.