Comment 15 for bug 1639345
Revision history for this message
| Roman Fiedler (roman-fiedler-deactivatedaccount) wrote | #15 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
Damn, that is bad. I missed this one.
Other idea: the control process stays outside the setns() and knows the PID of the child, right? Could that process open the file and send the content as message via the shared command socket? Seems less intrusive to me than adding more clone()s in the chain from control process to guest process?