Client does not ACK auth/assoc responses from Cisco AP3800
Bug #1647036 reported by
Stephen Anderson
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
bcmwl (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Alberto Milone | ||
Trusty |
Won't Fix
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Xenial |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Yakkety |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Zesty |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Alberto Milone |
Bug Description
This client does not ACK Assoc Responses from a Cisco 3800. Traces attached.
- Model: Dell XPS13 9343
- OS Version: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS
- WNIC: Broadcom BCM4352 rev. 03 driver version 6.30.223.248
- SSID: user.wifi (WPA2/dot1x )
- MAC address: c4:8e:8f:f5:4a:7f
-Cisco AP : 3800 (wave 2)
Changed in bcmwl (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Alberto Milone (albertomilone) |
importance: | Undecided → High |
status: | New → Triaged |
Changed in bcmwl (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Triaged → In Progress |
Changed in bcmwl (Ubuntu Trusty): | |
status: | New → Triaged |
Changed in bcmwl (Ubuntu Xenial): | |
status: | New → Triaged |
Changed in bcmwl (Ubuntu Trusty): | |
status: | Triaged → In Progress |
Changed in bcmwl (Ubuntu Xenial): | |
status: | Triaged → In Progress |
Changed in bcmwl (Ubuntu Yakkety): | |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in bcmwl (Ubuntu Trusty): | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
Changed in bcmwl (Ubuntu Xenial): | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
Changed in bcmwl (Ubuntu Yakkety): | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
To post a comment you must log in.
Hello Stephen, or anyone else affected,
Accepted bcmwl into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https:/ /launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ bcmwl/6. 30.223. 271+bdcom- 0ubuntu1~ 0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Testing/ EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/QATeam/ PerformingSRUVe rification . Thank you in advance!