Comment 41 for bug 873058

Revision history for this message
Jack Foy (jfoy) wrote : Re: Jockey fail to install binary ati driver (post release) version

I don't believe the fglrx installer failure is a bug in nvidia-common, but rather in the interface between jockey-common and fglrx-updates.

It looks like /usr/share/jockey/handlers/fglrx.py in package jockey-common expects the package fgrlx-updates to create a module named 'fglrx-updates', but the module generated by building that package is actually named 'fglrx'. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer-updates/+bug/825339

Can someone who knows this code comment on this issue? How can we get the jockey-common and fglrx-updates maintainers to agree on an interface?