(3) No architecture needs to provide libc-lowlevellock.c. The normal sysdep override mechanism should have selected the sparc32 version of lowlevellock.c *unless* your configure options failed to cause the selection of sparc32. Given that you have not provided a full report we don't know why sparc32 was not selected.
Please include the full log of running `./configure ...` since that will contain which sysdep directories were selected and in what override order.
(1) I've added Dave Miller (Sparc maintainer) to the CC.
(2) Please follow "What to put in a report": http:// www.gnu. org/software/ libc/bugs. html
(3) No architecture needs to provide libc-lowlevello ck.c. The normal sysdep override mechanism should have selected the sparc32 version of lowlevellock.c *unless* your configure options failed to cause the selection of sparc32. Given that you have not provided a full report we don't know why sparc32 was not selected.
Please include the full log of running `./configure ...` since that will contain which sysdep directories were selected and in what override order.
Thanks.