8086:0046 [Lenovo ThinkPad T510] Fuzzy and corrupted display after DPMS cycles

Bug #814325 reported by Marc Deslauriers
42
This bug affects 5 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Linux
Fix Released
Medium
linux (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
High
Unassigned
Natty
Fix Released
High
Unassigned
Oneiric
Won't Fix
High
Unassigned
Precise
Won't Fix
High
Unassigned
Quantal
Won't Fix
High
Unassigned
Raring
Won't Fix
High
Unassigned
Saucy
Won't Fix
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

Since updating to 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.2 in natty-proposed, screen comes up fuzzy and corrupted when coming out of the screensaver. I'm using the blank screen screensaver. Screen is flickery and graphics are corrupted and fuzzy. See attached screenshots.

This has now happened three times since I installed the version from -proposed, and had never happened before.

 it's happened 3 times in the last day and each time, I've rebooted, as I haven't figured out what else to do.
The screensaver probably has activated 30 times in the last day.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.47-generic 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,mousepoll,vpswitch,regex,animation,snap,expo,move,compiztoolbox,place,grid,imgpng,gnomecompat,wall,ezoom,workarounds,staticswitcher,resize,fade,unitymtgrabhandles,scale,session,unityshell]
CompositorRunning: compiz
Date: Thu Jul 21 18:18:03 2011
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: natty
DistroVariant: ubuntu
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0046] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:21d9]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Alpha amd64 (20110302)
MachineType: LENOVO 4313CTO
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-11-generic root=UUID=66b32bb3-1e18-436e-8f6e-62b8419ed48d ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
Renderer: Unknown
SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-intel
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/26/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 6MET81WW (1.41 )
dmi.board.name: 4313CTO
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Available
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr6MET81WW(1.41):bd10/26/2010:svnLENOVO:pn4313CTO:pvrThinkPadT510:rvnLENOVO:rn4313CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 4313CTO
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T510
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.4+bzr20110606-0ubuntu1~natty2
version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs 20090808ubuntu13
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu6
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.10.2-0ubuntu2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-0ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3.1
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.0-0ubuntu4.1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.2
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20110107+b795ca6e-0ubuntu7

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :
tags: added: regression-proposed
Bryce Harrington (bryce)
Changed in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Natty):
importance: Undecided → High
status: New → Triaged
summary: - fuzzy and corrupted display with update in -proposed
+ fuzzy and corrupted display with update in natty-proposed
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote : Re: fuzzy and corrupted display with update in natty-proposed

Here's my current dpkg.log

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

More info: when the problem occurs, it also happens on virtual consoles. Ctrl-Alt-F1 shows me a corrupted console also.

Revision history for this message
Bryce Harrington (bryce) wrote :

The 7.2 -intel update adds patch 121_fdo-28798-fix.patch. This patch significantly changes rendering behavior with 2D graphics acceleration, thus is definitely a strong suspect for this issue (although it's quite strange that it affects the console too!) To prove it is the patch's fault, downgrade to 7.1; if it no longer reproduces within ~1 day, then the patch is at fault and we should not proceed with the SRU. If it still reproduces, then we should examine dpkg.log for other possible suspects.

Corruption that affects the console indicates either a kernel bug, or an X bug that somehow put the GPU into a really bad state. Booting and reproducing on an earlier kernel would rule out it being due to a kernel update.

If it *is* pinpointed to the patch, would you mind also booting an oneiric livecd and see whether you can reproduce it there. I ask because we're already including this patch in oneiric and if the same issue exists there, we ought to look into it more closely. If it doesn't occur on oneiric, then presumably we can just forgo the 7.2 SRU and leave it at that.

Revision history for this message
Bryce Harrington (bryce) wrote :

upgrade bluefish 2011-07-20 08:04:37 2.0.2-1 2.0.2-1ubuntu1
upgrade bzr 2011-07-20 08:04:42 2.3.3-0ubuntu1 2.3.4-0ubuntu1
install eglibc 2011-07-21 13:41:23 <none> 2.13-0ubuntu13
upgrade linux 2011-07-19 16:05:37 2.6.38-10.46 2.6.38-11.47
install linux-headers-2.6.38-11 2011-07-19 16:05:31 <none> 2.6.38-11.47
install linux-headers-2.6.38-11-generic 2011-07-19 16:05:34 <none> 2.6.38-11.47
install linux-image-2.6.38-11-generic 2011-07-19 16:05:17 <none> 2.6.38-11.47
upgrade linux-meta 2011-07-19 16:05:28 2.6.38.10.25 2.6.38.11.26
upgrade nfs-utils 2011-07-20 08:04:48 1:1.2.2-4ubuntu5 1:1.2.2-4ubuntu5.1
install valgrind 2011-07-21 13:41:25 <none> 1:3.6.1-0ubuntu1
upgrade xserver-xorg-video-intel 2011-07-20 08:04:50 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.1 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.2

Either linux or -intel could be a suspect at this point, looks like nothing else of relevance got updated within the timeframe.

Bryce Harrington (bryce)
Changed in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

OK, looks like this isn't caused by the intel driver in proposed. I just had it happen with 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.1.
Next in line is the kernel update...

affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) → linux (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

I've been running with 2.6.38-10 for the past week, and this problem has not come back. This could definitely be a kernel regression.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

3 hours after trying 2.6.38-11 again, I've been hit by the bug. I'm pretty convinced this is a regression in the kernel currently in -proposed.

Revision history for this message
Herton R. Krzesinski (herton) wrote :

It's likely a drm/i915 change which is causing the regression. Probably one of these four candidates that we got through stable update to 2.6.38.8:
drm/i915: Fix gen6 (SNB) missed BLT ring interrupts.
drm/i915: disable PCH ports if needed when disabling a CRTC
drm: Send pending vblank events before disabling vblank.
drm/i915: fix user irq miss in BSD ring on g4x

In a hunch, I reverted "drm: Send pending vblank events before disabling vblank.", built, and uploaded amd64 packages at http://people.canonical.com/~herton/lp814325/r1/

Marc, can you test it?

If it works, then try the 11.48 when it hits -proposed, just to double check. If it fails, then we got our change which introduced the issue.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Thanks Herton, I'll install them now and let you know...It will take a day or two as I can't reproduce this at will, but it usually happens a couple of times a day.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

I've ran your test packages for the past day and a half and didn't get the issue.
I have now installed the 11.48 packages in -proposed, to see if it will come back.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

I've now hit the problem again with the 11.48 packages in -proposed. Since it took two days for me to hit it, I'm now switching back to your test packages to see if the commit you reverted was the right one. I think I didn't wait long enough.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Unfortunately, I have hit the issue with the test packages from comment #12.

@Herton: do you have a second candidate I could test? Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Herton R. Krzesinski (herton) wrote :

Ok, lets see if some of other remaining drm/i915 changes is at fault. Marc, please try the kernel from http://people.canonical.com/~herton/lp814325/r2/

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Thanks for the updated package Herton, I'm testing them now.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Herton, I've been running your updated packages for three days now with no sign of the regression. I'll continue running it, but I think you've located the problematic commits.

Revision history for this message
Herton R. Krzesinski (herton) wrote :

Thanks for testing, hopefully the regression really is gone reverting the 3 patches. If you could find an way to reproduce the problem more easily, may be come and go many times in sequence from screen saver/blank would be great, problem is I think you'll get bored easily always having to check the corrupted screen many times in a row :)

The three remaining reverted patches in r2 were:
drm/i915: Fix gen6 (SNB) missed BLT ring interrupts.
drm/i915: disable PCH ports if needed when disabling a CRTC
drm/i915: fix user irq miss in BSD ring on g4x

We should identify now which one is introducing the problem. I took a deep look again at them, and compared now against your reported hardware (lspci). You have an "ironlake" vga. The first and last patches touches code paths only related to sandybridge or gm45/g45 hardware, which shouldn't affect/change your case. Hoping this isn't a timing/code shuffle issue, now I strongly believe we could have a problem with the remaining patch:

drm/i915: disable PCH ports if needed when disabling a CRTC

This was a backport for hardware enablement, and also it is missing a following fix to this change which is upstream but wasn't backported to natty: "drm/i915: DP_PIPE_ENABLED must check transcoder on CPT".

First lets try to double check and really see if "drm/i915: disable PCH ports if needed when disabling a CRTC" introduces your regression, now I built a new kernel only with it reverted, please try the package http://people.canonical.com/~herton/lp814325/r3/

If this one works, then next step is including also "drm/i915: DP_PIPE_ENABLED must check transcoder on CPT" on natty, and doing another test to see if issue is gone.

Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

Yes, we really need that commit, so identifying additional ones to fix this bug would be most welcome.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

OK, with the attached script, I can reproduce the issue reliably with the -proposed kernel.

Your r3 kernel does not have the issue, so that's the right commit.

Revision history for this message
Herton R. Krzesinski (herton) wrote :

Marc, please try now the kernel from http://people.canonical.com/~herton/lp814325/r4/

It reapplies the fix plus the change "drm/i915: DP_PIPE_ENABLED must check transcoder on CPT"

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Herton, unfortunately the regression is in r4 :(

Revision history for this message
Herton R. Krzesinski (herton) wrote :

@Timo: any idea on this one? looks like we have to revert "drm/i915: disable PCH ports if needed when disabling a CRTC" for now :-/ The followup fix didn't worked.

Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

I'm wondering if this isn't a spread-spectrum bug - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1173193 sounds similar, although not identical. Maybe the connector is being turned back on with SSC enabled?

The patch starting that thread is not going to be applied upstream, as it just adds an option to work around a bug, but that means it could be used to test this SSC hypothesis.

Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

Oooh. Looks like the thread starting with http://<email address hidden> is likely to be the upstream fix for the spread-spectrum bit.

Revision history for this message
Robert Hooker (sarvatt) wrote :

Marc: Can you post the intel_reg_dumper output from before and after triggering this?

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

@Robert: unfortunately, they are the same.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

What's interesting is once the problem occurs, I can do xset dpms force off; xset dpms force on to make it go away again.

Revision history for this message
Keng-Yu Lin (lexical) wrote :

The following models are tested with epilepsy.sh in the comment #22

Lenovo ZHAOYANG E47 with Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2310M CPU @ 2.10GHz)
Acer eMachine AS4739Z with Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU P6200 @ 2.13GHz
Dell Inspiron N311z with Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2310M CPU @ 2.10GHz

but I cannot reproduce the bug.

Revision history for this message
Keng-Yu Lin (lexical) wrote :

BTW, the three models above were reported having bug 791752.

Revision history for this message
Keng-Yu Lin (lexical) wrote :

Dell Vostro V130 with Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU U 380 @ 1.33GHz

is tested for comparison. not able to reproduce either.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

I can't reproduce it either on a Dell Mini 9. That's the only other intel chipset machine I have.

Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

Herton, Marc: maybe test a newer mainline kernel (2.6.39, 3.0) to see that this really is fixed there, and if not, the patch that Chris pointed out could be another candidate to give a try.

Revision history for this message
Keng-Yu Lin (lexical) wrote :

Does this bug exist in Oneiric too?

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Unfortunately, I just tried with the Oneiric alpha3 amd64 live cd, and I have the same regression. Here are a couple of screenshots.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
importance: Undecided → High
Robert Hooker (sarvatt)
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Natty):
status: Triaged → Incomplete
Changed in linux:
importance: Unknown → Medium
status: Unknown → Confirmed
53 comments hidden view all 133 comments
Revision history for this message
In , Jesse Barnes (jbarnes-virtuousgeek) wrote :

I can't make sense of this based on the commit... I'm afraid this might be timing related rather than an actual register change, since the register dumps before & after are identical.

Can you isolate which part of the patch causes problems?

Revision history for this message
In , Robert Hooker (sarvatt) wrote :

(In reply to comment #9)
> I can't make sense of this based on the commit... I'm afraid this might be
> timing related rather than an actual register change, since the register dumps
> before & after are identical.
>
> Can you isolate which part of the patch causes problems?

Argh, I'm terribly sorry for this but the actual offending commit was

drm/i915: disable PCH ports if needed when disabling a CRTC

Which needed a bit of fixing to apply to .38, but has the same failure in both the backport and the upstream kernel

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-natty.git;a=commit;h=bbeaf8811ba070fd186dfcabc957044c3a1149ac

Revision history for this message
In , Jesse Barnes (jbarnes-virtuousgeek) wrote :

Ah ok, that makes more sense. Does this patch change anything? We might be disabling LVDS incorrectly (i.e. without a corresponding panel power sequence):

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_d
index 35364e6..ab8a36d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -1394,7 +1394,7 @@ static void intel_disable_pch_ports(struct drm_i915_privat
        val = I915_READ(reg);
        if (ADPA_PIPE_ENABLED(val, pipe))
                I915_WRITE(reg, val & ~ADPA_DAC_ENABLE);
-
+#if 0
        reg = PCH_LVDS;
        val = I915_READ(reg);
        if (LVDS_PIPE_ENABLED(val, pipe)) {
@@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ static void intel_disable_pch_ports(struct drm_i915_privat
                POSTING_READ(reg);
                udelay(100);
        }
-
+#endif
        disable_pch_hdmi(dev_priv, pipe, HDMIB);
        disable_pch_hdmi(dev_priv, pipe, HDMIC);
        disable_pch_hdmi(dev_priv, pipe, HDMID);

Revision history for this message
In , Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

@Jesse,

Unfortunately no, I can still reproduce with the patch in comment 11.

Revision history for this message
In , Robert Hooker (sarvatt) wrote :

(In reply to comment #12)
> @Jesse,
>
> Unfortunately no, I can still reproduce with the patch in comment 11.

he tested on 3.0.1 there with this kernel

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~sarvatt/fdo40172/

Revision history for this message
In , Jesse Barnes (jbarnes-virtuousgeek) wrote :

Can you try to isolate which part of the PCH port disable causes trouble? My other guess would be the panel register unlock, which might allow a clock change or something else to sneak in and cause LVDS problems...

Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: rls-mgr-o-tracking
Revision history for this message
In , Chris Wilson (ickle) wrote :

I wonder if this relates to drm/i915: Enable dither whenever display bpc < frame buffer bpc?

summary: - fuzzy and corrupted display with update in natty-proposed
+ fuzzy and corrupted display after dpms cycles
tags: added: verification-done-natty
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Oneiric):
milestone: none → oneiric-updates
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Precise):
status: New → Incomplete
importance: Undecided → High
tags: added: rls-mgr-p-tracking
removed: rls-mgr-o-tracking
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Natty):
status: Incomplete → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
In , Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

FYI, I still have this issue with 3.2.0.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
summary: - fuzzy and corrupted display after dpms cycles
+ fuzzy and corrupted display after DPMS cycles
Revision history for this message
In , Daniel-ffwll (daniel-ffwll) wrote :

Created attachment 59984
manual revert of offending patch

Can you please try with the latest 3.3 kernel (or maybe even 3.4-rc) and check whether this patch still solves your issues?

Revision history for this message
In , Jesse Barnes (jbarnes-virtuousgeek) wrote :

Any update? I think this must have been fixed by one of the dither fixes...

Changed in linux:
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
1 comments hidden view all 133 comments
Revision history for this message
In , Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Sorry for the delay. I've just tried, and I can still reliably reproduce this with 3.4rc5.

Revision history for this message
In , Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Do you want me to try with 3.4rc5 and the patch in comment 17?

Revision history for this message
In , Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

OK, unfortunately I can still reproduce the issue with 3.4rc5 and the patch in comment 17.

2 comments hidden view all 133 comments
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote : Re: fuzzy and corrupted display after DPMS cycles

I can still reproduce this reliably with 3.4rc5

Changed in linux:
status: Incomplete → In Progress
3 comments hidden view all 133 comments
Revision history for this message
In , Daniel-ffwll (daniel-ffwll) wrote :

Ok, so the manual revert doesn't help any longer. Which means something else changed, too.

Revision history for this message
Simon Bateman (batemans-25) wrote : Re: fuzzy and corrupted display after DPMS cycles

just upgraded from oneric to precise

Screen now a DISASTER ZONE!
=========================
When exiting any application the 'old app.screen' blurrs and fails to close at all
Some LaunchPad Icons disappear, clicking in the right spot does activate task.

Log-off icon has vanished to right of top menu bar

Using WORKSPACE SWITCHER to refresh screen does work to remove old app.

Last month (early MAY), I tried a 12.04 beta CD (from Linux User) without any screen problems.

using LENOVO 4151 laptop

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

@Simon: your bug has _nothing_ to do with this bug. Please file a new one, thanks.

Revision history for this message
In , Daniel-ffwll (daniel-ffwll) wrote :

Can you please try the modeset-rework branch from my personal git repo at:

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm

Among other things, this undoes the offending commit in a rather through-rough manner.

Revision history for this message
In , Chris Wilson (ickle) wrote :

2 months have passed since the last request for patch feedback, and the modeset-rework has landed upstream... Presuming fixed.

Changed in linux:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
dino99 (9d9) wrote : Re: fuzzy and corrupted display after DPMS cycles
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Confirmed → Invalid
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

I still have this issue with Raring and kernel 3.8.0.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Fix Released → Triaged
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Quantal):
status: New → Triaged
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Raring):
status: New → Triaged
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Saucy):
status: Fix Released → Triaged
Revision history for this message
In , Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

Sorry for the lack of feedback. I can still reproduce this reliably with 3.5.0 and 3.8.0.

dino99 (9d9)
tags: added: verification-done
removed: verification-done-natty
tags: added: precise raring saucy
removed: natty
tags: removed: regression-proposed
penalvch (penalvch)
tags: added: bios-outdated-1.52
removed: needs-reassignment
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote : Re: fuzzy and corrupted display after DPMS cycles

FYI, I just upgraded to bios 1.52 and can still reproduce this this saucy.

 Version: 6MET92WW (1.52 )

penalvch (penalvch)
tags: added: bisect-done latest-bios-1.52
removed: bios-outdated-1.52
Revision history for this message
penalvch (penalvch) wrote :

Marc Deslauriers, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? If so, could you please test for this with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ .

If it remains an issue, could you please just make a comment to this.

Also, could you please test the latest upstream kernel available (not the daily folder) following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds ? It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. Once you've tested the upstream kernel, please comment on which kernel version specifically you tested. If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following tags:
kernel-fixed-upstream
kernel-fixed-upstream-VERSION-NUMBER

where VERSION-NUMBER is the version number of the kernel you tested. For example:
kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.13-rc5

This can be done by clicking on the yellow circle with a black pencil icon next to the word Tags located at the bottom of the bug description. As well, please remove the tag:
needs-upstream-testing

If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the following tags:
kernel-bug-exists-upstream
kernel-bug-exists-upstream-VERSION-NUMBER

As well, please remove the tag:
needs-upstream-testing

Once testing of the upstream kernel is complete, please mark this bug's Status as Confirmed. Please let us know your results. Thank you for your understanding.

summary: - fuzzy and corrupted display after DPMS cycles
+ 8086:0046 [Lenovo ThinkPad T510] Fuzzy and corrupted display after DPMS
+ cycles
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
milestone: oneiric-updates → none
status: Triaged → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury) wrote : Closing unsupported series nomination.

This bug was nominated against a series that is no longer supported, ie saucy. The bug task representing the saucy nomination is being closed as Won't Fix.

This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Saucy):
status: Triaged → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury) wrote :

This bug was nominated against a series that is no longer supported, ie raring. The bug task representing the raring nomination is being closed as Won't Fix.

This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Raring):
status: Triaged → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury) wrote :

This bug was nominated against a series that is no longer supported, ie quantal. The bug task representing the quantal nomination is being closed as Won't Fix.

This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Quantal):
status: Triaged → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
In , Dustin-backlund (dustin-backlund) wrote :

I can verify this occurs occasionally with my Lenovo T510 ThinkPad on Trusty Tahr (14.04 Ubuntu). Please let me know if any supporting documentation is needed on my end.

Revision history for this message
In , Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

I can confirm that this is still an issue with 3.13 and 3.16.

Revision history for this message
In , Daniel-ffwll (daniel-ffwll) wrote :

Can someone lease retest with latest drm-intel-nightly from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel Thanks. Still no idea though what's amiss here ...

Revision history for this message
In , Dustin-backlund (dustin-backlund) wrote :

i would try this if someone could walk me through downloading, applying and installing this patch - i don't know what i'm doing here.

Revision history for this message
In , Robert Hooker (sarvatt) wrote :

(In reply to D B from comment #29)
> i would try this if someone could walk me through downloading, applying and
> installing this patch - i don't know what i'm doing here.

Long shot but if you're on debian or ubuntu you can install a new one from here http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/drm-intel-nightly/current/

Revision history for this message
In , Dustin-backlund (dustin-backlund) wrote :

trying to install from there gives me "Dependency is not satisfiable: linux-headers-3.18.0-994"

Changed in linux:
status: Fix Released → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
In , Jani-nikula (jani-nikula) wrote :

(In reply to Daniel Vetter from comment #28)
> Can someone lease retest with latest drm-intel-nightly from
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel Thanks. Still no idea though what's
> amiss here ...

Ping for the testing.

Revision history for this message
In , Dustin-backlund (dustin-backlund) wrote :

I would do the testing, but I'm unable to successfully install the new kernel. It would be appreciated if someone could give me a walk-through of how to accomplish this.

Revision history for this message
In , Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

The good news is I no longer seem to be able to reproduce this with kernel 3.18 in the current Ubuntu daily.

The bad news is running the test script three times in a row has given me a headache :)

Revision history for this message
In , Jani-nikula (jani-nikula) wrote :

(In reply to D B from comment #33)
> I would do the testing, but I'm unable to successfully install the new
> kernel. It would be appreciated if someone could give me a walk-through of
> how to accomplish this.

I'm afraid that's beyond our scope here; please try to look at your distro's documentation and wikis.

(In reply to Marc Deslauriers from comment #34)
> The good news is I no longer seem to be able to reproduce this with kernel
> 3.18 in the current Ubuntu daily.

Thanks for testing. I'm optimistic today, and closing the bug based on this. Please don't hesitate to reopen if the problem reappears on v3.18 or later.

> The bad news is running the test script three times in a row has given me a
> headache :)

I'm sorry to hear that, clearly RESOLVED NOTOURBUG though. ;)

Changed in linux:
status: Incomplete → Fix Released
Mathew Hodson (mhodson)
affects: linux → xserver-xorg-video-intel
Mathew Hodson (mhodson)
tags: added: natty needs-upstream-testing
removed: precise raring saucy ubuntu
Revision history for this message
Mathew Hodson (mhodson) wrote :

The upstream bug has been marked fixed, so this needs to be tested to see if it's still an issue.

Revision history for this message
Mathew Hodson (mhodson) wrote :

Could you please test the latest upstream kernel available (not the daily folder) following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds ? It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. Once you've tested the upstream kernel, please comment on which kernel version specifically you tested. If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following tags:
kernel-fixed-upstream
kernel-fixed-upstream-VERSION-NUMBER

where VERSION-NUMBER is the version number of the kernel you tested. For example:
kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.13-rc4

This can be done by clicking on the yellow circle with a black pencil icon next to the word Tags located at the bottom of the bug description. As well, please remove the tag:
needs-upstream-testing

If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the following tags:
kernel-bug-exists-upstream
kernel-bug-exists-upstream-VERSION-NUMBER

As well, please remove the tag:
needs-upstream-testing

Once testing of the upstream kernel is complete, please mark this bug's Status as Confirmed.

dino99 (9d9)
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Triaged → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
dino99 (9d9) wrote :

That report refer to an old issue, and there is no activity; so closing it.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Incomplete → Invalid
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Invalid
Mathew Hodson (mhodson)
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Saucy):
milestone: oneiric-updates → none
Mathew Hodson (mhodson)
affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel → linux
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: Invalid → Fix Released
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Invalid → Won't Fix
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Invalid → Won't Fix
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Quantal):
importance: Undecided → High
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Raring):
importance: Undecided → High
Displaying first 40 and last 40 comments. View all 133 comments or add a comment.