at-spi needs demotion for precise (at-spi2-core in main)

Bug #790240 reported by Matthias Klose
38
This bug affects 8 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
at-spi (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Medium
Luke Yelavich
Oneiric
Won't Fix
Medium
Luke Yelavich
Precise
Invalid
Medium
Luke Yelavich
brltty (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Foundations Team
Oneiric
Won't Fix
Medium
Unassigned
Precise
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Foundations Team
gnome-mag (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Oneiric
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Precise
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
java-access-bridge (Ubuntu)
Invalid
High
Luke Yelavich
Oneiric
Won't Fix
High
Luke Yelavich
Precise
Invalid
High
Luke Yelavich
java-atk-wrapper (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Oneiric
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Precise
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
libgail-gnome (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Oneiric
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Precise
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
Matthias Klose
Oneiric
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Precise
Fix Released
Medium
Matthias Klose

Bug Description

Binary package hint: at-spi

at-spi needs demotion for oneiric (at-spi2-core in main).

Matthias Klose (doko)
Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu Oneiric):
assignee: nobody → Luke Yelavich (themuso)
importance: Undecided → High
milestone: none → oneiric-alpha-2
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

I just demoted at-spi2-atk, no rdepends in main any more.

Remaining rdepends for at-spi:

-- oneiric/main build deps on at-spi:
java-access-bridge
-- oneiric/main build deps on libatspi-dev:
brltty
gnome-mag
java-access-bridge
libgail-gnome

Should we demote some of these together with at-spi?

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Not an alpha-2 release blocker, dropping to medium. If you prefer high, please re-target to beta.

Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu Oneiric):
importance: High → Medium
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

-- oneiric/main armel deps on libgail-gnome-module:
ubuntu-netbook

That's easy, just requires a seed update.

Changed in libgail-gnome (Ubuntu Oneiric):
importance: Undecided → Medium
milestone: none → oneiric-alpha-2
status: New → In Progress
status: In Progress → Triaged
Changed in brltty (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: New → Triaged
Changed in gnome-mag (Ubuntu Oneiric):
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Triaged
Martin Pitt (pitti)
Changed in java-access-bridge (Ubuntu Oneiric):
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Triaged
Changed in brltty (Ubuntu Oneiric):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

netbook-meta is obsolete according to Oliver, I removed the package. I demoted libgail-gnome.

Changed in libgail-gnome (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Triaged → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Remaining gnome-mag rdepends is gnome-orca (seeded in desktop)

Remaining brltty rdepends: seeded in ubuntu and kubuntu, d-i depends on brltty-udeb

Only rdepends of java-access-bridge is openjdk-6-jre.

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

yes, Luke is aware of it

Revision history for this message
Luke Yelavich (themuso) wrote :

Martin, at-spi2-atk is part of the at-spi2 stack, and was recently promoted to main. There was nothing in the seeds pulling in its binary package, as I forgot that nothing explicitly depended on it. I am going to add to the seeds, so please re-promote.

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

at-spi2-atk re-promoted.

Martin Pitt (pitti)
Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu Oneiric):
milestone: oneiric-alpha-2 → oneiric-alpha-3
Changed in libgail-gnome (Ubuntu Oneiric):
milestone: oneiric-alpha-2 → oneiric-alpha-3
Martin Pitt (pitti)
Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu Oneiric):
milestone: oneiric-alpha-3 → ubuntu-11.10-beta-1
Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

Luke, Matthias tells me that you plan to port java-access-bridge to at-spi2. Fixing the reverse-deps is a blocker for demoting at-spi, so I'm raising the priority of this bug and milestoning it appropriately; if you aren't going to be able to port this by beta2, it seems we should update openjdk-jre to not depend on java-access-bridge, since I guess it doesn't work anyway when only at-spi2 is installed.

Changed in java-access-bridge (Ubuntu Oneiric):
assignee: nobody → Luke Yelavich (themuso)
importance: Medium → High
milestone: none → ubuntu-11.10-beta-2
Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu Oneiric):
milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-1 → ubuntu-11.10-beta-2
Revision history for this message
Luke Yelavich (themuso) wrote : Re: [Bug 790240] Re: at-spi needs demotion for oneiric (at-spi2-core in main)

 affects ubuntu/java-atk-wrapper

Actually that is incorrect. Java-access-bridge is being replaced by java-atk-wrapper, which is now in the archive in universe. I will write an MIR for it this week, so it can replace java-access-bridge in main, and also help in demoting at-spi.

tags: added: rls-mgr-o-tracking
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : Re: at-spi needs demotion for oneiric (at-spi2-core in main)

java-atk-wrapper | 0.30.4-0ubuntu1 | oneiric/universe | source

Changed in java-atk-wrapper (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

 gnome-mag | 1:0.16.3-0ubuntu2 | oneiric/universe | source, amd64, armel, i386, powerpc

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Looks like the rest of this needs to happen in P.

Changed in java-access-bridge (Ubuntu Oneiric):
milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-2 → none
status: Triaged → Won't Fix
Changed in gnome-mag (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Triaged → Won't Fix
Changed in brltty (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Triaged → Won't Fix
Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Confirmed → Won't Fix
Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu):
milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-2 → later
Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu Oneiric):
milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-2 → none
tags: added: rls-mgr-p-tracking
removed: rls-mgr-o-tracking
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in java-access-bridge (Ubuntu Precise):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in java-atk-wrapper (Ubuntu Precise):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in libgail-gnome (Ubuntu Precise):
status: New → Confirmed
Steve Langasek (vorlon)
tags: added: rls-p-tracking
Changed in java-access-bridge (Ubuntu Precise):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in java-atk-wrapper (Ubuntu Precise):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in libgail-gnome (Ubuntu Precise):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Steve Langasek (vorlon)
Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu Precise):
assignee: nobody → Luke Yelavich (themuso)
Changed in java-access-bridge (Ubuntu Precise):
assignee: nobody → Luke Yelavich (themuso)
importance: Medium → High
Changed in libgail-gnome (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in java-atk-wrapper (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Steve Langasek (vorlon)
Changed in java-access-bridge (Ubuntu Precise):
milestone: none → ubuntu-12.04
assignee: Luke Yelavich (themuso) → Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations)
Changed in brltty (Ubuntu Precise):
milestone: none → ubuntu-12.04
assignee: nobody → Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations)
Changed in java-access-bridge (Ubuntu Precise):
assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) → Luke Yelavich (themuso)
Revision history for this message
Luke Yelavich (themuso) wrote :

This should be fixed in precise, and oneiric. I had to remove the build dep on at-spi for another upgrade related issue for oneiric. I can say for sure that brltty in oneiric and precise doesn't depend on libatspi-dev.

Changed in brltty (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Triaged → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

brltty is still in precise main, and not on component-mismatches, reopening.

summary: - at-spi needs demotion for oneiric (at-spi2-core in main)
+ at-spi needs demotion for precise (at-spi2-core in main)
Changed in brltty (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Fix Released → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

This wasn't about demoting brltty, but about fixing it to not depend on at-spi, which has been done. Marking as fixed again.

Changed in brltty (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Triaged → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

gnome-mag was demoted at the end of oneiric:

 gnome-mag | 1:0.16.3-0ubuntu2 | oneiric/universe | source, amd64, armel, i386, powerpc
 gnome-mag | 1:0.16.3-0ubuntu2 | precise/universe | source, amd64, armel, i386, powerpc

Changed in gnome-mag (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in gnome-mag (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

java-access-bridge is superseded by the at-spi2 libatk-wrapper-java / libatk-wrapper-java-jni (MIR was approved in bug 849729). According to Luke this is a drop-in replacement for libaccess-bridge-java-jni, so the only thing to do here is to change the dependency. Matthias, can you please do that for the next upload? Thanks!

Changed in openjdk-6 (Ubuntu Precise):
assignee: nobody → Matthias Klose (doko)
importance: Undecided → Medium
milestone: none → ubuntu-12.04-beta-1
status: New → Triaged
Changed in openjdk-6 (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: New → Won't Fix
Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu Precise):
milestone: none → precise-alpha-2
Revision history for this message
Luke Yelavich (themuso) wrote : Re: [Bug 790240] Re: at-spi needs demotion for precise (at-spi2-core in main)

Openjdk-6 has been tested with java-atk-wrapper. Attaching a patch with the changes so Doko can encorporate it into other changes he is working on.

Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

no further changes required to at-spi, this will fall out of main as soon as openjdk-6 is updated.

Changed in at-spi (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Confirmed → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package openjdk-6 - 6b24-1.11-0ubuntu1

---------------
openjdk-6 (6b24-1.11-0ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low

  * IcedTea6 1.11 release.

  [ Luke Yelavich ]
  * Use java-atk-wrapper instead of java-access-bridge for accessibility.
    LP: #790240.

  [ Matthias Klose ]
  * nss.cfg: Remove nssLibraryDirectory property, rely on the system
    library path.
  * Make the java.policy file multi-arch installable. LP: #924096.
  * Don't install desktop and menu files for multiarch builds.
    Needs a better solution. Closes: #658321
  * Pass -n to gzip when compressing manpages to be Multi-Arch: same safe.
  * Don't install an alternative for the deprecated apt tool.
  * Make the upgrade from a non-multiarch installation location more
    robust; don't depend on version numbers, but check the path of the
    alternatives. LP: #887077.
  * Always use the internal copy of liblcms1; only OpenJDK 7 has the
    support to use a system liblcms2.
  * Build jamvm on powerpc.
 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:20:59 +0100

Changed in openjdk-6 (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Triaged → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

java-access-bridge is being demoted, so doesn't require further changes to not depend on at-spi. It will be demoted automatically once the new openjdk-6 is built everywhere.

It should probably go away eventually, but there's no hurry to drop it before it's dropped in Debian.

Changed in java-access-bridge (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Confirmed → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package openjdk-6 - 6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.11.10.1

---------------
openjdk-6 (6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.11.10.1) oneiric-security; urgency=low

  * Backport OpenJDK 6b24/IcedTea 1.11.3 to oneiric.
  * debian/patches/java-access-bridge-security.patch: updated
  * debian/control.zero-jre: add powerpc arch back, to get empty
    transitional package
  * debian/rules: install README.Debian for openjdk-6-jre-zero to create
    empty transitional package and create package
  * debian/README.Debian: explain openjdk-6-jre-zero went away
  * regenerate debian/control
  * add back build depends on g++-4.5 for armel/armhf

openjdk-6 (6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.12.04.1) precise-security; urgency=low

  * SECURITY UPDATE: update to IcedTea 6 1.11.3
    - Security fixes:
      - S7079902, CVE-2012-1711: Refine CORBA data models
      - S7110720: Issue with vm config file loadingIssue with vm
        config file loading
      - S7143606, CVE-2012-1717: File.createTempFile should be improved
        for temporary files created by the platform.
      - S7143614, CVE-2012-1716: SynthLookAndFeel stability improvement
      - S7143617, CVE-2012-1713: Improve fontmanager layout lookup
        operations
      - S7143851, CVE-2012-1719: Improve IIOP stub and tie generation
        in RMIC
      - S7143872, CVE-2012-1718: Improve certificate extension
        processing
      - S7145239: Finetune package definition restriction
      - S7152811, CVE-2012-1723: Issues in client compiler
      - S7157609, CVE-2012-1724: Issues with loop
      - S7160677: missing else in fix for 7152811
      - S7160757, CVE-2012-1725: Problem with hotspot/runtime_classfile
    - Bug fixes:
      - PR1018: JVM fails due to SEGV during rendering some Unicode
        characters (part of 6886358)
  * Changelog, Makefile.am, aclocal.m4,
    arm_port/hotspot/src/cpu/zero/vm/asm_helper.cpp,
    patches/idresolver_fix.patch,
    patches/openjdk/6792400-Avoid_loading_Normalizer_resources.patch:
    drop inline changes, applied upstream
  * debian/patches/atk-wrapper-security.patch: updated
  * Makefile.{am,in}: don't apply patches/jtreg-LastErrorString.patch as
    it causes the testsuite runner to fail.
 -- Steve Beattie <email address hidden> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:14:37 -0700

Changed in openjdk-6 (Ubuntu Oneiric):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.