Enabling of Pro Services Does Not Update when using airgapped mirrors over http://

Bug #2031192 reported by Steven LaCosse
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
High
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Xenial
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
Bionic
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
Jammy
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
Mantic
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

[Impact]

When users create an airgapped environement, they may create APT mirrors for the ESM services that share a common base URL. For example, in this bug here, the user was mirroring their services one:

http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/bionic-esm-apps-security
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/bionic-esm-apps-updates
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/bionic-esm-infra-security/
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/bionic-esm-infra-updates/
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/fips-bionic/
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/jammy-esm-apps-security/

As we can see, all services share the
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ APT url.
Since the Pro client was looking for unique urls to distinguish enabled services in the machine, this setup was not working.

Now, instead of looking at the APT url, we are also looking at the suite (i.e. bionic-esm-apps-security)

If we identify that both APT url and suite are in the output of apt-cache policy
with the right permission number, we say that the service is enabled.

This will unblock users that want to use the same APT url for their airgapped setup.

Additionally, we have discussed this issue with the Landscape team and they assured us that we will always have an unique combination of APT url and suite.

[Test cases]

We have setup an integration test for this scenario on the Pro client codebase.
We will link the test result here.

[ Regression Potential ]

We believe we are now improving our check to see if the service is enabled or not, as we are now considering a combination that we now will be unique. Therefore, the only regression potential we can think is the situation were we mistakenly create that combination (APT url + suite) or check it in a wrong way in the output of apt-cache policy.

However, we believe our integration tests should be enough to assert that this is not the case.

[ Original Description]

contract server is airgapped and running
uaclient is pointing to the airgapped contract server to get entitlements

Additionally, using a landscape server and it's underlying reprepro to mirror ESM and FIPs for airgap, this forces using http
apt update is working over landscape over multiple repos.

pro attach subscriptioncontract, is working
next
pro enable service is creating /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/90ubuntu-advantage with correct apt entry, apt update can pickup the airgapped repo but with warning of http://

For example: pro enable esm-apps

Service Status is not getting updating

pro status is showing after enablement of esm-apps

SERVICE ENTITLED STATUS DESCRIPTION
esm-apps yes disabled Expanded Security Maintenance for Applications
esm-infra yes disabled Expanded Security Maintenance for Infrastructure

Editing 90ubuntu-advantage to append http:// get rids of the apt update working but service status is not changing.

Issuing pro enable esm-apps appends another entry and is a loop

ubuntu-advantage.log is showing the following

["2023-08-11T16:54:20.596", "DEBUG", "uaclient.files.files", "read", 55, "File does not exist: /var/lib/ubuntu-advantage/user-config.json", {}]
["2023-08-11T16:54:22.233", "DEBUG", "root", "subp", 634, "Failed running command 'apt-cache policy' [exit(100)]. Message: E: Problem renaming the file /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin.K4g76Q to /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin - rename (2: No such file or directory)\nW: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems\nE: The package cache file is corrupted\n", {}]
["2023-08-11T16:54:22.233", "WARNING", "root", "subp", 636, "Stderr: E: Problem renaming the file /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin.K4g76Q to /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin - rename (2: No such file or directory)\nW: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems\nE: The package cache file is corrupted\n\nStdout: ", {}]
["2023-08-11T16:54:22.234", "DEBUG", "root", "subp", 640, "Failed running command 'apt-cache policy' [exit(100)]. Message: E: Problem renaming the file /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin.K4g76Q to /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin - rename (2: No such file or directory)\nW: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems\nE: The package cache file is corrupted\n Retrying 3 more times.", {}]
["2023-08-11T16:54:23.213", "DEBUG", "root", "_subp", 581, "Ran cmd: apt-get update, rc: 0 stderr: b''", {}]

For auditing purposes the status of subscription and it's services is important to be correct. Additionally to insure correct packages for fips get installed.

summary: - Enabling of Pro Service Does Not Update when using airgapped mirrors
+ Enabling of Pro Services Does Not Update when using airgapped mirrors
over http://
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) wrote :

Hi motosteven,

Thanks for reporting this. I have one idea, which I want to verify if it will work.
On clean machine, please setup the airgapped contract server so that the services repo paths already have the http:// protocol on them. After that, try attaching again and let me know what happens.

Revision history for this message
Steven LaCosse (motosteven) wrote :

Thanks Lucas for looking into this.

In my original report, I've been testing the ua contract server as the same machine I'm trying to enable the airgapped subscription to, which also happens to be joined to the landscape server.
I have not created a repo profile to enable the esm repos via landscape.

I've tried what you've suggested.

When the repo path already has http:// in the service repo path prior to attaching the sub and enabling this removes the the http error when enabling esm-apps.

The prior error was

["2023-08-15T08:23:01.054", "DEBUG", "root", "_subp", 581, "Ran cmd: apt-get update, rc: 0 stderr: b'W: http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/jammy-updates/InRelease: /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/90ubuntu-advantage: Credentials for landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ match, but the protocol is not encrypted. Annotate with http:// to use.\\nW: http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/jammy-security/InRelease: /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/90ubuntu-advantage: Credentials for landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ match, but the protocol is not encrypted. Annotate with http:// to use.\\nW: http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/jammy/InRelease: /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/90ubuntu-advantage: Credentials for landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ match, but the protocol is not encrypted. Annotate with http:// to use.\\nW: http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/landscape/dists/jammy/InRelease: /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/90ubuntu-advantage: Credentials for landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ match, but the protocol is not encrypted. Annotate with http:// to use.\\nW: http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/jammy-esm-apps-security/InRelease: /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/90ubuntu-advantage: Credentials for

With esm-apps repo already in service repo with http, unfortunately enabling esm-apps still shows the same problem of not showing the service enabled
Enabling esm-apps does create the /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-esm-apps.list
So the repo packages are available to use, apt update shows this

apt update

Hit:1 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-updates InRelease
Hit:2 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-security InRelease
Hit:3 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy InRelease
Hit:4 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/landscape jammy InRelease
Hit:5 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-esm-apps-security InRelease

But it still does not change the status of the subscription service enablement

pro status
SERVICE ENTITLED STATUS DESCRIPTION
esm-apps yes disabled Expanded Security Maintenance for Applications
esm-infra yes disabled Expanded Security Maintenance for Infrastructure
livepatch yes disabled Canonical Livepatch service
realtime-kernel yes disabled Ubuntu kernel with PREEMPT_RT patches integrated
usg yes disabled Security compliance and audit tools

Revision history for this message
Steven LaCosse (motosteven) wrote :
Download full text (7.6 KiB)

More information when trying to enable service
The line may be more relevant and maybe blocking it.

["2023-08-15T16:03:17.569", "DEBUG", "root", "add_auth_apt_repo", 419, "Not enabling apt suite \"jammy-esm-apps-updates\" because \"jammy-updates\" is not enabled", {}]

pro enable esm-apps
One moment, checking your subscription first
Updating package lists
Ubuntu Pro: ESM Apps enabled

["2023-08-15T16:03:17.112", "DEBUG", "root", "readurl", 340, "URL [GET] response: http://landscapeservertest.com:8484/v1/resources/esm-apps/context/machines/b712583b169b4f9ba0ca9b71023feff8, headers: {'Connection': 'close', 'Content-Length': '1303', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'Date': 'Tue, 15 Aug 2023 21:03:17 GMT', 'X-Trace-Id': '335cf548-224c-4789-82e8-37d60455994b'}, data: {'entitlement': {'type': 'esm-apps', 'entitled': True, 'affordances': {'architectures': ['aarch64', 'amd64', 'arm64', 'i386', 'i686', 'ppc64el', 'ppc64le', 's390x', 'x86_64'], 'series': ['xenial', 'bionic', 'focal', 'jammy']}, 'directives': {'aptKey': 'I REMOVED THIS KEY STRING', 'aptURL': 'http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/', 'suites': ['jammy-esm-apps-security', 'jammy-esm-apps-updates', 'bionic-esm-apps-security', 'bionic-esm-apps-updates']}, 'obligations': {'enableByDefault': False}, 'series': {'bionic': {'directives': {'suites': ['bionic-esm-apps-security', 'bionic-esm-apps-updates']}}, 'jammy': {'directives': {'suites': ['jammy-esm-apps-security', 'jammy-esm-apps-updates']}}}, 'overrides': [{'selector': {'series': 'bionic'}, 'directives': {'suites': ['bionic-esm-apps-security', 'bionic-esm-apps-updates']}}, {'selector': {'series': 'jammy'}, 'directives': {'suites': ['jammy-esm-apps-security', 'jammy-esm-apps-updates']}}, {'selector': {}, 'affordances': {'architectures': ['amd64', 'i386', 'i686', 's390x', 'x86_64']}}]}, 'resourceToken': '<REDACTED>'}", {}]
["2023-08-15T16:03:17.116", "DEBUG", "root", "write_file", 492, "Writing file /var/lib/ubuntu-advantage/private/machine-access-esm-apps atomically via tempfile /var/lib/ubuntu-advantage/private/tmp4h0w4aqr", {}]
["2023-08-15T16:03:17.568", "DEBUG", "root", "_subp", 581, "Ran cmd: apt-cache policy, rc: 0 stderr: b''", {}]
["2023-08-15T16:03:17.569", "DEBUG", "root", "add_auth_apt_repo", 419, "Not enabling apt suite \"jammy-esm-apps-updates\" because \"jammy-updates\" is not enabled", {}]
["2023-08-15T16:03:17.569", "DEBUG", "root", "write_file", 492, "Writing file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-esm-apps.list atomically via tempfile /etc/apt/sources.list.d/tmpsbsu6kix", {}]
["2023-08-15T16:03:17.579", "DEBUG", "root", "load_file", 452, "Reading file: /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/90ubuntu-advantage", {}]
["2023-08-15T16:03:17.580", "DEBUG", "root", "write_file", 492, "Writing file /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/90ubuntu-advantage atomically via tempfile /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/tmpauumoje5", {}]
["2023-08-15T16:03:17.580", "DEBUG", "root", "export_gpg_key", 18, "Exporting GPG key /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-advantage-esm-apps.gpg", {}]
["2023-08-15T16:03:17.987", "DEBUG", "uaclient.config", "parse_config", 644, "Using client configuration file at /etc/ubuntu-advantage/uaclient.conf", {}]
["2023-08-15T16:03:17.989", "DEBUG", "root...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) wrote :

Hi motosteven,

Thanks for the updates here. Just to double check, can you send the full output of both of these commands:

$ apt update
$ apt-cache policy

For the esm services, we use the output of apt-cache policy as a way to check if the service is enabled or not. So it will probably give us a clue of what is happening here.

Revision history for this message
Steven LaCosse (motosteven) wrote :
Download full text (4.7 KiB)

Hi Lucus,
My example issue will be issuing apt update and apt-cache policy after a fresh attach and enable esm-apps
This adds the esm-security repo into ubuntu-esm-apps.list but falls short of enabling esm-updates probably from comment #3

cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-esm-apps.list

deb http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-esm-apps-security main
# deb-src http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-esm-apps-security main
# deb http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-esm-apps-updates main
# deb-src http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-esm-apps-updates main

If I manually comment out the jammy-esm-apps-updates, then apt update would show it but for this example I will continue without manual intervention.

apt update

Hit:1 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-updates InRelease
Hit:2 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-security InRelease
Hit:3 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy InRelease
Hit:4 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/redacted1 jammy InRelease
Hit:5 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/redacted2 jammy InRelease
Hit:6 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/landscape jammy InRelease
Hit:7 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-esm-apps-security InRelease
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
44 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.

apt-cache policy

Package files:
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     release a=now
 500 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy-esm-apps-security/main amd64 Packages
     release a=jammy-esm-apps-security,n=jammy-esm-apps-security,c=main,b=amd64
     origin landscapeservertest.com
 500 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/landscape jammy/main amd64 Packages
     release a=jammy,n=jammy,c=main,b=amd64
     origin landscapeservertest.com
 500 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/redacted2 jammy/main amd64 Packages
     release a=jammy,n=jammy,c=main,b=amd64
     origin landscapeservertest.com
 500 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/redacted1 jammy/redacted1 amd64 Packages
     release a=jammy,n=jammy,c=puppet6,b=amd64
     origin landscapeservertest.com
 500 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy/multiverse amd64 Packages
     release a=jammy,n=jammy,c=multiverse,b=amd64
     origin landscapeservertest.com
 500 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy/universe amd64 Packages
     release a=jammy,n=jammy,c=universe,b=amd64
     origin landscapeservertest.com
 500 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy/restricted amd64 Packages
     release a=jammy,n=jammy,c=restricted,b=amd64
     origin landscapeservertest.com
 500 http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
     release a=jammy,n=jammy,c=main,b=amd64
     origin landscapeservertest.com
 500 http://landscapeservertest.com/repo...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) wrote :

Hi motosteven,

It seems that everything is correct on both of these commands.
Can you run this python script here on the affected machine and report the output of it:

---------------
from uaclient.entitlements.esm import ESMAppsEntitlement
from uaclient.config import UAConfig

esm_apps = ESMAppsEntitlement(UAConfig())
ret, reason = esm_apps.user_facing_status()
print(ret, reason)
-----------------

Revision history for this message
Steven LaCosse (motosteven) wrote :

UserFacingStatus.INACTIVE NamedMessage('service-not-configured', 'Ubuntu Pro: ESM Apps is not configured', None)

Revision history for this message
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) wrote :

Okay, that is curious.

Can you provide the full content of the aptURL overwrite you are using ? I just want to double check if that URL might be causing this issue

Revision history for this message
Steven LaCosse (motosteven) wrote :

For the airgapped contract server the override aptURL in the yml file is:

This took some trial and error for me to get originally but this allowed enable to find the repo.

http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/

I've been trying to play around with it but with no luck by editing the suites including on top of the overrides.

     directives:
        aptKey: REDACTED
        aptURL: http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone/
        suites:
        - jammy-apps-security
        - jammy-apps-updates
        - bionic-apps-security
        - bionic-apps-updates
      entitled: true
      obligations:
        enableByDefault: false
      overrides:
      - directives:
          suites:
          - bionic-esm-apps-security
          - bionic-esm-apps-updates
        selector:
          series: bionic
      - directives:
          suites:
          - jammy-esm-apps-security
          - jammy-esm-apps-updates
        selector:
          series: jammy
      - affordances:
          architectures:
          - amd64
          - i386
          - i686
          - s390x
          - x86_64
      series:
        bionic:
          directives:
            suites:
            - bionic-apps-security
            - bionic-apps-updates
        jammy:
          directives:
            suites:
            - jammy-apps-security
            - jammy-apps-updates
      type: esm-apps

Revision history for this message
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) wrote :

Thanks for that motosteven,

Can you change the URL to not include the last "/":
http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone

I think that is causing the issue. Can you please test it again on a clean machine and report if the service turns out enabled in the end.

Revision history for this message
Steven LaCosse (motosteven) wrote (last edit ):
Download full text (36.5 KiB)

Hi Lucas,

I remembered why I had to add the / and it was because it wasn't working as expected and doing odd behavior as well.

I have changed the override to remove the / and try what you ask for more bug report logs.

But from a "fresh ubuntu-advantage-tools/machine" with no prior joining or changes it errors when attaching the subscription.

Please see ubuntu-advantage.log, I have to remove/edit and redact certain information

after "pro attach"

["2023-08-16T13:50:22.946", "ERROR", "root", "process_entitlements_delta", 454, "Unexpected error processing contract delta for esm-apps: {'entitlement': {'type': 'esm-apps', 'entitled': True, 'affordances': {'architectures': ['aarch64', 'amd64', 'arm64', 'i386', 'i686', 'ppc64el', 'ppc64le', 's390x', 'x86_64'], 'series': ['xenial', 'bionic', 'focal', 'jammy']}, 'directives': {'aptKey': 'E8A443CE358113D187BEE0E6AB01A101DB53907B', 'aptURL': 'http://landscapeservertest.com/repository/standalone', 'suites': ['jammy-esm-apps-security', 'jammy-esm-apps-updates']}, 'obligations': {'enableByDefault': False}, 'overrides': [{'selector': {'series': 'bionic'}, 'directives': {'suites': ['bionic-esm-apps-security', 'bionic-esm-apps-updates']}}, {'selector': {'series': 'focal'}, 'directives': {'suites': ['focal-apps-security', 'focal-apps-updates']}}, {'selector': {'series': 'jammy'}, 'directives': {'suites': ['jammy-esm-apps-security', 'jammy-esm-apps-updates']}}, {'selector': {'series': 'xenial'}, 'affordances': {'architectures': ['amd64', 'i386', 'i686', 's390x', 'x86_64']}, 'directives': {'suites': ['xenial-apps-security', 'xenial-apps-updates']}}]}}", {"exc_info": "Traceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/contract.py\", line 435, in process_entitlements_delta\n deltas, service_enabled = process_entitlement_delta(\n File \"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/contract.py\", line 534, in process_entitlement_delta\n ret = entitlement.process_contract_deltas(\n File \"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/entitlements/repo.py\", line 202, in process_contract_deltas\n if not self._check_apt_url_is_applied(delta_apt_url):\n File \"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/entitlements/repo.py\", line 154, in _check_apt_url_is_applied\n for line in system.load_file(apt_file).strip().split(\"\\n\")\n File \"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/system.py\", line 453, in load_file\n with open(filename, \"rb\") as stream:\nFileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-esm-apps.list'"}]

pro status is showing that the service is enabled but this is not true

SERVICE ENTITLED STATUS DESCRIPTION
esm-apps yes enabled Expanded Security Maintenance for Applications
esm-infra yes enabled Expanded Security Maintenance for Infrastructure
livepatch yes disabled Canonical Livepatch service
realtime-kernel yes disabled Ubuntu kernel with PREEMPT_RT patches integrated
usg yes disabled Security compliance and audit tools

It's in a broken state at this point.
pro enable esm-apps
One moment, checking your subscription first
Ubuntu Pro:...

Revision history for this message
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) wrote (last edit ):

Okay, I think I understand what the problem is. We check if a esm service is enabled by looking at the specified aptURL in the output of apt-cache policy. Since that URL also appear on other apt sources (i.e. jammy/universe), we will think that the esm services are both enabled.

This is a bug on our side as we understand we need a better strategy to see if the services are indeed enabled.

However, until we can deliver that fix, would it be possible to host the esm mirrors on a different path ?
We would need an unique path for both esm-infra and esm-apps for this to work as is.

But please, let us know if it is not possible to change the path for the esm apt mirrors.

Revision history for this message
Steven LaCosse (motosteven) wrote (last edit ):

Hi Lucas,

I am hosting esm, cis, fips, and fips-updates for on-prem landscape in the ubuntu distribution but they are all under unique series as recommended by landscape so packages do not overlap.

IE:
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/bionic-esm-apps-security
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/bionic-esm-apps-updates
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/bionic-esm-infra-security/
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/bionic-esm-infra-updates/
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/fips-bionic/
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu/dists/jammy-esm-apps-security/
and so on

Just to understand the workaround:
Are you suggesting to put of all of these cis{usg}/esm/fips under a different distribution like
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/ubuntupro/dists/{series} ?

For now I'd rather just enable each apt repo via landscape repo profile or a different configuration management tool and wait for a fix for correct service enablement. The newer landscape client/server has ability to report status of ubuntu pro services so there is added benefit to get this working for on-prem repos, landscape and airgapped environments.

Thanks,

Steven

Revision history for this message
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) wrote :

Hi motosteven,

The problem is on the base url (everything that comes before the /ubuntu bit) itself:
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/

We need that base url to be unique for each service. For example:
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/infra/
http://landscaperepo.com/repository/standalone/apps/

Another possibility is to also create an alias address for those apt sources and if the alias path are unique, it should also work as expected.

Regarding the fix, we will probably be able to deliver it on November, which is the month we will release a new version of the library. I will let you know if that changes.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura)
status: New → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Steven LaCosse (motosteven) wrote :

Thanks for your clarification Lucas, for now it's too much effort to change the repo pulls, but good to note for the workaround. Looking forward to the fix.

Revision history for this message
Grant Orndorff (orndorffgrant) wrote :

Thanks for the discussion here and discovering these bugs. We hope to fix these soon, but just to set expectations, we will probably get to this in the 24.04 cycle, so it will be a few months.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → High
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~24.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Mantic):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-mantic
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Jammy):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-jammy
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-focal
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Bionic):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-bionic
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-xenial
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~16.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32~16.04) for xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (i386)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (i386)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~23.10)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32~23.10) for mantic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/0.99.39 (armhf)
update-manager/1:23.10.1 (arm64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/mantic/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~24.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32~24.04) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
update-motd/unknown (s390x)
wsl-pro-service/0.1.4 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~22.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32~22.04) for jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/0.99.22.9 (armhf)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
update-motd/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~20.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32~20.04) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~24.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~24.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1~24.04) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
wsl-pro-service/0.1.4 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~20.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1~20.04) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~16.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1~16.04) for xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (i386)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64, i386)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-advantage-tools - 32.1

---------------
ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: allow access for /etc/os-release on all supported
    profiles (LP: #2065573)
  * apport: get path for timer job status from the correct place (LP: #2065616)

 -- Lucas Moura <email address hidden> Tue, 14 May 2024 11:22:35 +0200

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~24.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.