Activity log for bug #2063152

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2024-04-22 20:14:08 Frode Nordahl bug added bug
2024-04-22 20:44:40 Frode Nordahl description There is an issue with running the DPDK tests on arm64 which is currently worked around by using 1G hugepages as opposed to 2M hugepages (bug 2059400) as well as increasing the number of pages available (bug 2063112). This workaround does however not work for the test mention in this bugs summary. I propose we skip the test until we find a more permanent solution to this issue. There is an issue with running the DPDK tests on arm64 which is currently worked around by using 1G hugepages as opposed to 2M hugepages (bug 2059400) as well as increasing the number of pages available (bug 2063112). This workaround does however not work for the test mentioned in this bugs summary. I propose we skip the test until we find a more permanent solution to this issue.
2024-04-23 12:59:59 Frode Nordahl description There is an issue with running the DPDK tests on arm64 which is currently worked around by using 1G hugepages as opposed to 2M hugepages (bug 2059400) as well as increasing the number of pages available (bug 2063112). This workaround does however not work for the test mentioned in this bugs summary. I propose we skip the test until we find a more permanent solution to this issue. There is an issue with running the DPDK tests on arm64 which is currently worked around by using 1G hugepages as opposed to 2M hugepages (bug 2059400) as well as increasing the number of pages available (bug 2063112). This workaround does however not work for the following tests: OVS-DPDK - MTU increase vport port OVS-DPDK - MTU decrease vport port OVS-DPDK - MTU upper bound vport port OVS-DPDK - user configured mempool I propose we skip the test until we find a more permanent solution to this issue.
2024-04-23 13:00:31 Frode Nordahl summary [arm64] autopkgtest - 'OVS-DPDK - MTU increase vport port' test does not fit within CI memory constraints [arm64] autopkgtest - some DPDK tests do not fit within CI memory constraints
2024-04-24 14:13:11 Frode Nordahl description There is an issue with running the DPDK tests on arm64 which is currently worked around by using 1G hugepages as opposed to 2M hugepages (bug 2059400) as well as increasing the number of pages available (bug 2063112). This workaround does however not work for the following tests: OVS-DPDK - MTU increase vport port OVS-DPDK - MTU decrease vport port OVS-DPDK - MTU upper bound vport port OVS-DPDK - user configured mempool I propose we skip the test until we find a more permanent solution to this issue. [ Impact ] The autopkgtest for openvswitch on arm64 currently always fails, which prevents us from catching any real architecture specific regressions as dependencies are updated in the stable release. [ Test Plan ] Trigger autopkgtest runs against PPA and document their output / result. [ Regression Potential ] As this is a test-only change, I'd say none for the actual end user consumption of the package. For CI stability however, the issue appears to have been present throughout the development phase of Noble, so there may be test cases with architecture specific flakiness which has yet to be uncovered. Rest assured, we will follow up with any required updates if they do appear. [ Other Info ] There is an issue with running the DPDK tests on arm64 which is currently worked around by using 1G hugepages as opposed to 2M hugepages (bug 2059400) as well as increasing the number of pages available (bug 2063112). This workaround does however not work for the following tests:     OVS-DPDK - MTU increase vport port     OVS-DPDK - MTU decrease vport port     OVS-DPDK - MTU upper bound vport port     OVS-DPDK - user configured mempool I propose we skip the test until we find a more permanent solution to this issue.
2024-04-24 14:13:28 Frode Nordahl nominated for series Ubuntu Noble
2024-04-24 14:13:28 Frode Nordahl bug task added openvswitch (Ubuntu Noble)
2024-04-24 14:13:28 Frode Nordahl nominated for series Ubuntu Mantic
2024-04-24 14:13:28 Frode Nordahl bug task added openvswitch (Ubuntu Mantic)
2024-04-27 14:36:09 Launchpad Janitor openvswitch (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2024-04-27 14:36:09 Launchpad Janitor openvswitch (Ubuntu Mantic): status New Confirmed
2024-04-30 21:18:49 Steve Langasek tags block-proposed-noble
2024-04-30 21:19:13 Steve Langasek openvswitch (Ubuntu Noble): status Confirmed Fix Committed
2024-04-30 21:19:15 Steve Langasek bug added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2024-04-30 21:19:17 Steve Langasek bug added subscriber SRU Verification
2024-04-30 21:19:20 Steve Langasek tags block-proposed-noble block-proposed-noble verification-needed verification-needed-noble
2024-05-02 08:29:44 Frode Nordahl tags block-proposed-noble verification-needed verification-needed-noble block-proposed-noble verification-done verification-done-noble
2024-05-02 17:31:16 Frode Nordahl openvswitch (Ubuntu): status Confirmed Fix Committed
2024-05-04 10:22:57 Launchpad Janitor openvswitch (Ubuntu): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2024-05-23 14:01:31 Frode Nordahl tags block-proposed-noble verification-done verification-done-noble verification-done verification-done-noble
2024-06-03 13:55:18 Mauricio Faria de Oliveira bug added subscriber Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2024-06-03 15:32:15 Mauricio Faria de Oliveira tags verification-done verification-done-noble verification-needed verification-needed-noble
2024-06-07 13:12:33 Frode Nordahl tags verification-needed verification-needed-noble verification-done verification-done-noble
2024-06-10 09:47:37 Launchpad Janitor openvswitch (Ubuntu Noble): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2024-06-10 09:47:45 Łukasz Zemczak removed subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2024-07-16 18:52:27 Brian Murray openvswitch (Ubuntu Mantic): status Confirmed Won't Fix