[SRU] Please upgrade Lucid gramps from 3.2.0 to 3.2.3

[Jeremy Bícha]

Binary package hint: gramps

Please sync the version of gramps in Lucid from 3.2.0 to the 3.2.3 release in Maverick.
3.2.3 fixes bug 507739 which causes a crash when filters are attempted to be used in Lucid. The developers considers filters as "very important tools" in Gramps. Many other bugfixes are included since 3.2.0, among them several other crash fixes.

The release announcements:
http://gramps-project.org/2010/05/gramps-3-2-3-i-used-to-eat-there-really-good-noodles-released/
http://gramps-project.org/2010/04/gramps-3-2-1-%E2%80%9Cone-of-those-men-is-my-father%E2%80%9D-released/

3.2.3 is currently in Maverick & Debian unstable (but will migrate to testing next week). I have tested the new version and things appear to work fine. Although the debdiff is large, regression potential is low as many known bugs have been fixed and development work is mostly being done in their trunk branch, not the 3.2.* branch.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: gramps 3.2.3-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.34-2.9-generic 2.6.34-rc7
Uname: Linux 2.6.34-2-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue May 18 18:59:37 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha amd64 (20100219.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gramps

[Mossroy (mossroy)]

An upgrade of this package would also solve this issue : https://bugs.launchpad.net/gramps/+bug/584639

[Jonathan Riddell (jr)]

in lucid-proposed unapproved queue, waiting on ack from ubuntu-sru before accepting

[Mossroy (mossroy)]

I made a quick test on the package http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/g/gramps/gramps_3.2.3-1_all.deb (from lucid-proposed)
The issue of https://bugs.launchpad.net/gramps/+bug/584639 seems to be corrected and I did not notice any big regression.

[Martin Pitt (pitti)]

The new version is in maverick.

[Martin Pitt (pitti)]

I rejected the 3.2.3-1ubuntu1 upload, since it has a version number higher than maverick. It should be called 3.2.3-1~lucid instead, since it's a backport.

Also, the diff is huge, and thus it's not quite obvious that it doesn't have regressions. If you want to go through with this, this requires some serious testing and checking for regressions on already installed gramps systems, i. e. it'll take a long time until lucid-updates,. You might consider backporting the two individual fixes for the other two bugs if this is urgent. But if you want to have 3.2.3, I didn't see changes which were entirely unreasonable for an SRU.

[Rolf Leggewie (r0lf)]

lucid has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any updates. Marking the lucid task for this ticket as "Won't Fix".