Comment 320 for bug 441835

Revision history for this message
peter b (b1pete) wrote :

@NooP

I was just curious personally (I'm just an ordinary user) after #307, #314 , #315 and #317 comments re natty natty-beta. I just conveyed my experience with natty beta to Martin (the dev assigned, now #316 and previous show something else) and to ..'and anyone interested.'.. ie #307, #314 , #315 and #317

as a matter of fact natty does not even appear - it is not part of this bug - it is Linux and other releases and packages -, with various status, assignments etc - see above.

however, it appears that at least one other udisks specific issue (see #539515) has been addressed under #312 above and .... posted here on #441835 and, on both accounts, there was no reasoning of any kind by anyone as of why they were posted here.

so I guess it's your pick, sort of pick and choose at this time. does anyone moderate this bug ? is it you NooP ?