Rename ua_logs.tar.gz to up_logs.tar.gz
- Jammy (22.04)
- Bug #2033313
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned | ||
Xenial |
Fix Committed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bionic |
Fix Committed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Focal |
Fix Committed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Jammy |
Fix Committed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Mantic |
Fix Committed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Noble |
Fix Committed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
[ Impact ]
Since we want users to relate to the Pro name when using the client, renaming the collect_logs output from ua_logs to pro_logs is a step on that direction.
[ Test Plan ]
This is already covered by the integration tests tied to the next Pro release.
We will append the result of that test in this bug once verification is done.
[ Regression Potential]
This is just renaming a file, therefore we strongly believe that this should not have any regression risks from our users, unless that are automating the log collection somehow, which is not recommended.
[ Original Description]
Ubuntu Advantage has been renamed to Ubuntu Pro, therefore the produced tar file should be renamed to align with these changes.
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) wrote : | #1 |
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
importance: | Low → Wishlist |
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Committed |
description: | updated |
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #2 |
Note that some files inside the tarball were also renamed, i.e., ua-status.json became pro-status.json. This should also be called out in the SRU template.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Please test proposed package | #3 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Noble): | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
tags: | added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble |
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Mantic): | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
tags: | added: verification-needed-mantic |
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #4 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Jammy): | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
tags: | added: verification-needed-jammy |
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #5 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Focal): | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
tags: | added: verification-needed-focal |
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #6 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Bionic): | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
tags: | added: verification-needed-bionic |
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #7 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial): | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
tags: | added: verification-needed-xenial |
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #8 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~16.04) | #9 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
ubuntu-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~23.10) | #10 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
update-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~24.04) | #11 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
update-motd/unknown (s390x)
wsl-pro-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~22.04) | #12 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
ubuntu-
update-motd/unknown (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~20.04) | #13 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Please test proposed package | #14 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #15 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #16 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #17 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #18 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #19 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~24.04) | #20 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
wsl-pro-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~20.04) | #21 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~16.04) | #22 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
ubuntu-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #23 |
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-
---------------
ubuntu-
* d/apparmor: allow access for /etc/os-release on all supported
profiles (LP: #2065573)
* apport: get path for timer job status from the correct place (LP: #2065616)
-- Lucas Moura <email address hidden> Tue, 14 May 2024 11:22:35 +0200
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Please test proposed package | #24 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #25 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #26 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #27 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #28 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : | #29 |
Hello Brandon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~16.04) | #30 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~24.04) | #31 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~24.04) | #32 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
ubuntu-
update-motd/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~16.04) | #33 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~23.10) | #34 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
update-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~22.04) | #35 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
ubuntu-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~20.04) | #36 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~18.04) | #37 |
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-
update-
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUp
[1] https:/
Thank you!
Hi Brandon,
Thanks for reporting this. I agree we should change the name of the file too. I will add this to our backlog and mark this bug as wishlist.