I don't see anything mentioning PAM. But I'm a perl hacker, not a C
coder, and I have no dev experience of gnome, so this may not prove a thing!
Please shout if there are any tests on my setup that anybody needs me to
perform.
Ta,
Karl
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> There is no code change upstream which seem likely to do a change there,
> maybe the people building from svn didn't build the pam integration code
> though?
>
> ** Changed in: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Medium => High
>
Sebastien - that could well be it.
I don't have a log of precisely what I did, but it boils down to roughly:
- install gnome-devel
- download gnome-keyring from svn
- configure with prefix = /usr
- install
I doubt gnome-devel installs any PAM headers, so gnome-keyring probably
didn't attempt to build any pam integration code.
An ldd of my /usr/bin/ gnome-keyring- daemon gives:
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7f93000) 2.0.so. 0 => /usr/lib/ libgthread- 2.0.so. 0 (0xb7f7d000) i686/cmov/ librt.so. 1 (0xb7f74000) libgconf- 2.so.4 (0xb7f43000) libdbus- 1.so.3 (0xb7f0d000) so.11 (0xb7ec0000) libtasn1. so.3 (0xb7eb0000) 2.0.so. 0 => /usr/lib/ libgobject- 2.0.so. 0 (0xb7e74000) libglib- 2.0.so. 0 (0xb7dc3000) i686/cmov/ libpthread. so.0 (0xb7daa000) i686/cmov/ libc.so. 6 (0xb7c5b000) .so.1 (0xb7c42000) 2.0.so. 0 => /usr/lib/ libgmodule- 2.0.so. 0 (0xb7c3e000) i686/cmov/ libdl.so. 2 (0xb7c3a000) libORBit- 2.so.0 (0xb7be7000) error.so. 0 (0xb7be3000) libpcre. so.3 (0xb7bbc000)
libgthread-
librt.so.1 => /lib/tls/
libgconf-2.so.4 => /usr/lib/
libdbus-1.so.3 => /usr/lib/
libgcrypt.so.11 => /lib/libgcrypt.
libtasn1.so.3 => /usr/lib/
libgobject-
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/
libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f94000)
libgmodule-
libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/
libORBit-2.so.0 => /usr/lib/
libgpg-error.so.0 => /lib/libgpg-
libpcre.so.3 => /usr/lib/
I don't see anything mentioning PAM. But I'm a perl hacker, not a C
coder, and I have no dev experience of gnome, so this may not prove a thing!
Please shout if there are any tests on my setup that anybody needs me to
perform.
Ta,
Karl
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> There is no code change upstream which seem likely to do a change there,
> maybe the people building from svn didn't build the pam integration code
> though?
>
> ** Changed in: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Medium => High
>