Backport packages for 20.04.5 HWE stack

Bug #1980805 reported by Timo Aaltonen
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
libdrm (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Won't Fix
Undecided
Unassigned
llvm-toolchain-13 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Won't Fix
Undecided
Unassigned
mesa (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Won't Fix
Undecided
Unassigned
mesa-amber (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Won't Fix
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

[Impact]

These are needed for 20.04.5 images.

[Test case]

Boot a daily image, see that it still has the necessary stack installed and working.

[What could go wrong]

libdrm: pci-id updates, some minor api updates

mesa: a new major release, but we'll pull the final stable release of 22.0.x series, so there shouldn't be any regressions left at that point

mesa-amber: forked from mesa 21.3.x, this LTS branch keeps old DRI drivers that were removed from main mesa

Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
description: updated
Changed in mesa-amber (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in mesa (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in libdrm (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in xorg-server (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
no longer affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
no longer affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu Focal)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mesa-amber into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa-amber/21.3.7-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in mesa-amber (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted llvm-toolchain-13 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-13/1:13.0.1-2ubuntu2~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in llvm-toolchain-13 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libdrm into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/2.4.110-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in libdrm (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (libdrm/2.4.110-1ubuntu1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted libdrm (2.4.110-1ubuntu1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ffmpeg/7:4.2.7-0ubuntu0.1 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#libdrm

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
kisak (kisak) wrote :

Hi, please note that there will be minor lost functionality from mesa-amber not being on the per-release i386 package whitelist.

Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
Changed in llvm-toolchain-13 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-13/1:13.0.1-2ubuntu2~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted llvm-toolchain-13 (1:13.0.1-2ubuntu2~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

cargo/0.62.0ubuntu0libgit2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#llvm-toolchain-13

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
Changed in mesa (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Won't Fix
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
Changed in mesa-amber (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Changed in llvm-toolchain-13 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Changed in libdrm (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.