Activity log for bug #1900088

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2020-10-16 05:20:34 Po-Hsu Lin bug added bug
2020-10-16 05:21:49 Po-Hsu Lin bug task added linux (Ubuntu)
2020-10-16 05:30:08 Ubuntu Kernel Bot linux (Ubuntu): status New Incomplete
2020-10-16 05:34:05 Po-Hsu Lin tags ubuntu-kernel-selftests
2020-10-16 05:34:06 Po-Hsu Lin description == SRU Justification == The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example: raw csum_off with bad offset (fails) ./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output. It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead. The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact. == Fix == * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so that the test output can be more understandable. == Regression Potential == Low, minor changes for test case description only. == SRU Justification == The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:   raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)   ./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output. It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead. The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact. == Fix == * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so that the test output can be more understandable. == Test == Patch tested by applying to the tree directly, the test description will be changed as expected. == Regression Potential == Low, minor changes for test case description only.
2020-10-16 05:34:38 Po-Hsu Lin nominated for series Ubuntu Groovy
2020-10-16 05:34:38 Po-Hsu Lin bug task added linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
2020-10-16 05:34:38 Po-Hsu Lin nominated for series Ubuntu Focal
2020-10-16 05:34:38 Po-Hsu Lin bug task added linux (Ubuntu Focal)
2020-10-16 05:37:47 Po-Hsu Lin description == SRU Justification == The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:   raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)   ./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output. It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead. The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact. == Fix == * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so that the test output can be more understandable. == Test == Patch tested by applying to the tree directly, the test description will be changed as expected. == Regression Potential == Low, minor changes for test case description only. == SRU Justification == The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:   raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)   ./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output. It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead. The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact. == Fix == * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so that the test output can be more understandable. This test case exists only after Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked. == Regression Potential == Low, minor changes for test case description only.
2020-10-16 05:38:02 Po-Hsu Lin description == SRU Justification == The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:   raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)   ./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output. It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead. The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact. == Fix == * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so that the test output can be more understandable. This test case exists only after Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked. == Regression Potential == Low, minor changes for test case description only. == SRU Justification == The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:   raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)   ./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output. It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead. The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact. == Fix == * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so that the test output can be more understandable. This test case exists since Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked. == Regression Potential == Low, minor changes for test case description only.
2020-10-16 07:11:19 Po-Hsu Lin description == SRU Justification == The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:   raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)   ./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output. It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead. The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact. == Fix == * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so that the test output can be more understandable. This test case exists since Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked. == Regression Potential == Low, minor changes for test case description only. == SRU Justification == The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:   raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)   ./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output. It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead. The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact. == Fix == * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so that the test output can be more understandable. This test case exists after Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked. == Regression Potential == Low, minor changes for test case description only.
2020-10-16 07:11:26 Po-Hsu Lin ubuntu-kernel-tests: assignee Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew)
2020-10-16 07:11:28 Po-Hsu Lin linux (Ubuntu Focal): assignee Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew)
2020-10-16 07:11:30 Po-Hsu Lin linux (Ubuntu Groovy): assignee Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew)
2020-10-16 07:11:33 Po-Hsu Lin linux (Ubuntu Focal): status New In Progress
2020-10-16 07:11:36 Po-Hsu Lin linux (Ubuntu Groovy): status Incomplete In Progress
2020-10-16 07:11:40 Po-Hsu Lin bug task added linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu)
2020-10-16 07:11:50 Po-Hsu Lin linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Groovy): status New Invalid
2020-10-16 07:11:54 Po-Hsu Lin linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal): status New In Progress
2020-10-16 07:11:57 Po-Hsu Lin linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal): assignee Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew)
2020-10-16 09:37:36 Timo Aaltonen linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal): status In Progress Fix Committed
2020-10-17 17:26:39 Ubuntu Kernel Bot tags ubuntu-kernel-selftests ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-needed-focal
2020-10-19 03:20:55 Po-Hsu Lin ubuntu-kernel-tests: status New In Progress
2020-10-21 03:15:48 Po-Hsu Lin tags ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-needed-focal ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-done-focal
2020-10-21 19:36:37 Launchpad Janitor linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-10-21 19:36:37 Launchpad Janitor cve linked 2020-12351
2020-10-21 19:36:37 Launchpad Janitor cve linked 2020-12352
2020-10-21 19:36:37 Launchpad Janitor cve linked 2020-24490
2020-10-22 18:05:20 Ian May linux (Ubuntu Focal): status In Progress Fix Committed
2020-10-27 10:31:20 Kleber Sacilotto de Souza linux (Ubuntu Groovy): status In Progress Fix Committed
2020-11-17 10:07:40 Ubuntu Kernel Bot tags ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-done-focal ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-done-focal verification-needed-groovy
2020-11-27 09:52:53 Po-Hsu Lin tags ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-done-focal verification-needed-groovy ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy
2020-11-27 09:52:58 Po-Hsu Lin ubuntu-kernel-tests: status In Progress Fix Released
2020-11-27 09:53:24 Po-Hsu Lin linux (Ubuntu): status In Progress Fix Released
2020-11-30 15:46:09 Launchpad Janitor linux (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-11-30 15:46:09 Launchpad Janitor cve linked 2020-14351
2020-11-30 15:46:09 Launchpad Janitor cve linked 2020-4788
2020-12-01 17:43:22 Launchpad Janitor linux (Ubuntu Groovy): status Fix Committed Fix Released