Comment 21 for bug 1788098

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

Thanks for your continuous efforts on this Leonardo, I have no further suggestion.
I think to stay on the safe side we will keep everything as-is for now.

I'd say it is IBMs call to decide between this now:
a) Speed: Call 1781526 unblocked by the evaluation here. We'd re-consider SRUing that bug then based on your call this won't cause issues on ppc64el.
b) Safety: since it was only a minor performance improvement but has the potential hidden breakage associated we keep 1781526 in Won't Fix