On Sep 05, 2011, at 03:32 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>It does sound like we should go ahead with the new version for >zope.sqlalchemy. FFe approved for that too.
Sounds good; I'll upload that.
On Sep 05, 2011, at 03:32 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>It does sound like we should go ahead with the new version for
>zope.sqlalchemy. FFe approved for that too.
Sounds good; I'll upload that.