zenity crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

Bug #984903 reported by dasunsrule32
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
zenity (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

gnome-shell froze, so I had to ctrl+alt+backspace. Logged back in and this popped up. Thanks.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: zenity 3.4.0-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: openafs nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Apr 10 08:21:44 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/zenity
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007)
ProcCmdline: zenity --list --checklist --text Choose_Java_versions_to_DELETE_(if_any)! --column Choose --column Version FALSE /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun FALSE /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.26 FALSE /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.30
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=screen-bce
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x40e33d: testb $0x8,0x5e(%rdi)
 PC (0x0040e33d) ok
 source "$0x8" ok
 destination "0x5e(%rdi)" (0x0000005e) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: zenity
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: zenity crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-24 (53 days ago)
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
dasunsrule32 (aaron.e) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #979019, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.