Ashley, I guess your comment #4 is well-meant, but please NEVER suggest this kind of stuff. It is a VERY bad idea to install binary packages meant for a different distribution. If you want that package, RECOMPILE it for your distribution. You and everyone else have been warned.
Going by what you say and what multiple others have confirmed this seems to be a regression after 1.0.21 that was present in 1.0.22 and has since been fixed in 1.0.23.
Can you guys please test if "sudo scanimage -L" correctly identifies the printer and "scanimage -L" does not?
Ashley, I guess your comment #4 is well-meant, but please NEVER suggest this kind of stuff. It is a VERY bad idea to install binary packages meant for a different distribution. If you want that package, RECOMPILE it for your distribution. You and everyone else have been warned.
Going by what you say and what multiple others have confirmed this seems to be a regression after 1.0.21 that was present in 1.0.22 and has since been fixed in 1.0.23.
Can you guys please test if "sudo scanimage -L" correctly identifies the printer and "scanimage -L" does not?