Activity log for bug #778758

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2011-05-06 21:15:43 DavidBriscoe bug added bug
2011-05-07 08:14:15 Bryce Harrington xorg (Ubuntu): assignee Bryce Harrington (bryce)
2011-05-07 11:55:36 bugbot tags amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 natty running-unity ubuntu amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 kubuntu natty running-unity ubuntu
2011-05-13 15:33:52 Bryce Harrington nominated for series Ubuntu Natty
2011-05-13 15:33:52 Bryce Harrington bug task added xorg (Ubuntu Natty)
2011-05-13 15:33:52 Bryce Harrington nominated for series Ubuntu Oneiric
2011-05-13 15:33:52 Bryce Harrington bug task added xorg (Ubuntu Oneiric)
2011-05-13 15:34:09 Bryce Harrington xorg (Ubuntu Natty): status New In Progress
2011-05-13 15:34:14 Bryce Harrington xorg (Ubuntu Oneiric): status New In Progress
2011-05-13 15:34:19 Bryce Harrington xorg (Ubuntu Natty): assignee Bryce Harrington (bryce)
2011-05-18 03:21:36 Bryce Harrington description Binary package hint: xorg When I use ubuntu-bug to report bugs on xorg-related packages (unity, compiz, xorg), I'm presented with this question: Development is completed for the 'natty' version of Ubuntu, so you should use technical support channels unless you know for certain it should be reported here? If I found a bug that I want to report, the only applicable yes option is "Yes, The problem began after doing a system software update." This implies that the developers are interested in regressions, but not new bugs. More information on the askubuntu question here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/39358/why-does-ubuntu-bug-imply-that-i-shouldnt-report-bugs-for-compiz-and-unity Brian Murray said it's due to xorg's apport hook and I was asked to report this bug. It's frustrating as a user to run ubuntu-bug to report a bug, then be told to go to askubuntu, then be told there that it's a bug and you should report it. However, I also want developers to spend their available time fixing real bugs. Perhaps if the hook added a "tech-supported" tag to bugs that had already gone through tech support so that those bugs can rise to the top? Or if you could import an AskUbuntu question into a bug report so it feels like asking on AskUbuntu is an important step in the bug reporting process. (Yes, copy-paste does most of that, but I think psychologically it's very different.) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,gnomecompat,snap,mousepoll,vpswitch,regex,extrawm,grid,imgpng,compiztoolbox,text,move,place,resize,wall,session,animation,unitymtgrabhandles,expo,workarounds,ezoom,staticswitcher,fade,scale,unityshell,scaleaddon,scalefilter] CompositorRunning: compiz DRM.card0.DP.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: Off modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.LVDS.1: status: connected enabled: enabled dpms: On modes: 1366x768 edid-base64: AP///////wAw5AFwAAAAAAASAQOAIhN4Ck6FnltVlSYaUFQAAAABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBPhxWoFAAFjAwIDUAWMIQAAAZPhxWoFAAFjAwIDUAWMIQAAAZAAAA/gBENjY5SoExNTZXSDIKAAAAAAD//////////wEBCiAgAME= DRM.card0.VGA.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: Off modes: edid-base64: Date: Fri May 6 13:57:18 2011 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: natty DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: bcmwl, 5.100.82.38+bdcom, 2.6.38-8-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:02aa] Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:02aa] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427.1) MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron 1545 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic root=UUID=19e6b2b5-cf83-4ea1-9103-e65b2b680694 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 Renderer: Unknown SourcePackage: xorg UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 05/13/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A07 dmi.board.name: 0G848F dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA07:bd05/13/2009:svnDellInc.:pnInspiron1545:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0G848F:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: dmi.product.name: Inspiron 1545 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.4+bzr20110415-0ubuntu2 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs 20090808ubuntu13 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu6 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.10.2-0ubuntu2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.0-0ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20110107+b795ca6e-0ubuntu7 [Impact] Message for the apport hook causes some confusion for X and compiz bug reporters that are trying to report bugs post-release. [Development Fix] The same change was applied to the ubuntu xorg git tree and will be uploaded shortly. [Stable Fix] The user is presented with a choice of three 'yes' options: One to flag regressions, one to flag bugs with patches, and one for everything else. For the last option we simplify the wording to just say 'Yes'. Ideally we'd like people to exhaust technical support options before filing bug reports, but recommending they do so is causing confusion. [Test Case] Running 'ubuntu-bug xorg' on natty will show the dialog. [Regression Potential] The worst thing that can happen from this change would be that the xorg apport hook no longer works for attaching info to bug reports. [Original Report] When I use ubuntu-bug to report bugs on xorg-related packages (unity, compiz, xorg), I'm presented with this question: Development is completed for the 'natty' version of Ubuntu, so you should use technical support channels unless you know for certain it should be reported here? If I found a bug that I want to report, the only applicable yes option is "Yes, The problem began after doing a system software update." This implies that the developers are interested in regressions, but not new bugs. More information on the askubuntu question here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/39358/why-does-ubuntu-bug-imply-that-i-shouldnt-report-bugs-for-compiz-and-unity Brian Murray said it's due to xorg's apport hook and I was asked to report this bug. It's frustrating as a user to run ubuntu-bug to report a bug, then be told to go to askubuntu, then be told there that it's a bug and you should report it. However, I also want developers to spend their available time fixing real bugs. Perhaps if the hook added a "tech-supported" tag to bugs that had already gone through tech support so that those bugs can rise to the top? Or if you could import an AskUbuntu question into a bug report so it feels like asking on AskUbuntu is an important step in the bug reporting process. (Yes, copy-paste does most of that, but I think psychologically it's very different.) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,gnomecompat,snap,mousepoll,vpswitch,regex,extrawm,grid,imgpng,compiztoolbox,text,move,place,resize,wall,session,animation,unitymtgrabhandles,expo,workarounds,ezoom,staticswitcher,fade,scale,unityshell,scaleaddon,scalefilter] CompositorRunning: compiz DRM.card0.DP.1:  status: disconnected  enabled: disabled  dpms: Off  modes:  edid-base64: DRM.card0.LVDS.1:  status: connected  enabled: enabled  dpms: On  modes: 1366x768  edid-base64: AP///////wAw5AFwAAAAAAASAQOAIhN4Ck6FnltVlSYaUFQAAAABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBPhxWoFAAFjAwIDUAWMIQAAAZPhxWoFAAFjAwIDUAWMIQAAAZAAAA/gBENjY5SoExNTZXSDIKAAAAAAD//////////wEBCiAgAME= DRM.card0.VGA.1:  status: disconnected  enabled: disabled  dpms: Off  modes:  edid-base64: Date: Fri May 6 13:57:18 2011 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: natty DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: bcmwl, 5.100.82.38+bdcom, 2.6.38-8-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard:  Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])    Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:02aa]    Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:02aa] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427.1) MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron 1545 ProcEnviron:  LANGUAGE=en_CA:en  LANG=en_CA.UTF-8  SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic root=UUID=19e6b2b5-cf83-4ea1-9103-e65b2b680694 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 Renderer: Unknown SourcePackage: xorg UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 05/13/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A07 dmi.board.name: 0G848F dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA07:bd05/13/2009:svnDellInc.:pnInspiron1545:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0G848F:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: dmi.product.name: Inspiron 1545 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.4+bzr20110415-0ubuntu2 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs 20090808ubuntu13 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu6 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.10.2-0ubuntu2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.0-0ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20110107+b795ca6e-0ubuntu7
2011-05-18 03:23:14 Bryce Harrington bug added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2011-05-18 05:11:51 Martin Pitt xorg (Ubuntu Natty): status In Progress Fix Committed
2011-05-18 05:11:54 Martin Pitt bug added subscriber SRU Verification
2011-05-18 05:11:56 Martin Pitt tags amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 kubuntu natty running-unity ubuntu amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 kubuntu natty running-unity ubuntu verification-needed
2011-05-18 06:22:11 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/xorg
2011-05-19 02:42:29 Jorge Castro bug added subscriber Jorge O. Castro
2011-06-14 12:50:11 Launchpad Janitor xorg (Ubuntu Oneiric): status In Progress Fix Released
2011-06-14 19:14:19 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/xorg
2011-06-28 08:04:07 Launchpad Janitor xorg (Ubuntu Natty): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2011-06-28 08:04:31 Brian Murray bug added subscriber Brian Murray