Comment 33 for bug 68267

Revision history for this message
Paul Jackson (pj-usa) wrote :

Paul Dufresne wrote:
> So as I understand: "set +e" make sure that it will NOT exit
> script because of the non-zero expr results. Which seems ok.

Aha - you're right. I didn't notice that it was <set +e, set -e>,
not the reverse order. Thanks for pointing that out.