Hmm really? I hadn't been testing, it was planned.
David Megginson wrote:
> On 17/09/2007, Bryan Haskins <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>
>> Again see my last reply there, but this again is straying off topic. My
>> understanding is that the system will actually be checked for proper
>> compatibility before all of this. Worst case, it tries to start up, X
>> dies, and restarts in Compatibility mode, Compiz is disabled, and all's
>> fine, but the regular check should catch most things, so no worries =]
>>
>
> It's not checked now. Does someone plan to implement that in gutsy in
> the next four weeks, or is there already a feature freeze?
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
> David
>
>
Hmm really? I hadn't been testing, it was planned.
David Megginson wrote:
> On 17/09/2007, Bryan Haskins <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>
>> Again see my last reply there, but this again is straying off topic. My
>> understanding is that the system will actually be checked for proper
>> compatibility before all of this. Worst case, it tries to start up, X
>> dies, and restarts in Compatibility mode, Compiz is disabled, and all's
>> fine, but the regular check should catch most things, so no worries =]
>>
>
> It's not checked now. Does someone plan to implement that in gutsy in
> the next four weeks, or is there already a feature freeze?
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
> David
>
>