main inclusion report for xmlrpc-c

Bug #369918 reported by Jonathan Riddell
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
xmlrpc-c (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Related branches

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package xmlrpc-c - 1.06.27-1ubuntu1

---------------
xmlrpc-c (1.06.27-1ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low

  * Split out libraries used by cmake into libxmlrpc-core-c3-dev and
    libxmlrpc-core-c3 to put only those parts into main, LP: #369918

 -- Jonathan Riddell <email address hidden> Fri, 01 May 2009 20:20:33 +0000

Changed in xmlrpc-c (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

I believe this was invalidly closed with the upload, reopening for MIR review.

Changed in xmlrpc-c (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Released → New
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Source is already in main, and generally looks okay. I bumped the build score, since this blocks lots of stuff.

Changed in xmlrpc-c (Ubuntu):
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

NEWed to main

Changed in xmlrpc-c (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Alexander Sack (asac) wrote : Re: [Bug 369918] Re: main inclusion report for xmlrpc-c

On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:49:48AM -0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> NEWed to main

As I stated during quick review on weekend xmlrpc-c introduces a new
set of sources and even server libs for xmlrpc - which imo would
justify a new security review; alternatively I suggested to make two
binary packages; one with the parts that are needed for cmake and the
other binary for the new server parts; only the non-server parts
should then be promoted to main.

 - Alexander

Revision history for this message
Alexander Sack (asac) wrote :

On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:11:08AM -0000, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:49:48AM -0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > NEWed to main
>
> As I stated during quick review on weekend xmlrpc-c introduces a new
> set of sources and even server libs for xmlrpc - which imo would
> justify a new security review; alternatively I suggested to make two
> binary packages; one with the parts that are needed for cmake and the
> other binary for the new server parts; only the non-server parts
> should then be promoted to main.

OK, I oversaw that the split was already done. sorry for the noise ;).

 - Alexander

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.