xfwm4 crashed with SIGSEGV in set_reload()

Bug #1416818 reported by Václav Haisman
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Edit Remove
14
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
xfwm4 (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

It crashed when I hit Apply button after tweaking tooltip foreground/background colours in gnome-color-chooser.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: xfwm4 4.11.2-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-lowlatency 3.16.7-ckt3
Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Sun Feb 1 11:02:14 2015
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xfwm4
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-11-13 (1175 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012)
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/xfwm4 --display :0.0 --sm-client-id 280cf5785-b8ae-4afb-ac48-a591eba41baf
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f620cb26cb9 <client_event_cb+73>: movl $0x1,0x1c(%rdx)
 PC (0x7f620cb26cb9) ok
 source "$0x1" ok
 destination "0x1c(%rdx)" (0x0000001c) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: xfwm4
StacktraceTop:
 set_reload (data=0x0, ev=0x7f620df248b0, obj=<optimized out>) at events.c:2683
 client_event_cb (widget=0x7f620ddf60c0, ev=0x7f620df248b0, data=<optimized out>) at events.c:2755
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
 g_closure_invoke (closure=0x7f620de9e9f0, return_value=0x7fffe0f703f0, n_param_values=2, param_values=0x7fffe0f704a0, invocation_hint=0x7fffe0f70440) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.42.1/./gobject/gclosure.c:768
 signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=node@entry=0x7f620ddd1350, detail=detail@entry=0, instance=instance@entry=0x7f620ddf60c0, emission_return=emission_return@entry=0x7fffe0f70550, instance_and_params=instance_and_params@entry=0x7fffe0f704a0) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.42.1/./gobject/gsignal.c:3553
Title: xfwm4 crashed with SIGSEGV in set_reload()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to utopic on 2014-10-25 (99 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lp lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev sambashare scanner tape vboxusers video wireshark

Revision history for this message
Václav Haisman (vzeman79) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1054276, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in xfwm4 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Jeffery Wilkins (djcanadianjeff) wrote :

how do we get a backtrace of xfwm4?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
  • Duplicate of a private bug Remove

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.